Sinusoids- Fundamentals of Electric Circuits

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
kostantina
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Find the phase angle between i_1= - 4 sin(377t+55) and i_2= 5 cos(377t-65)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I converted i_1= 4 cos(377t+145) and i_2=5cos(377t-65)

According to lectures in class the 'most' negative leads. So in this case i_2 leads by -65-145=210. However, if you look at the publishers solution it says that i_1 leads by 210. Why? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Here is a link to the publishers solution posted online on his student edition help/tools website:

Its problem 9.2

http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073380571/938372/Chapt09PP_120121.pdf
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
I did and according to my lectures i_2 should lead. +x axis is the +cos(wt) and the -y axis is the +sin(wt)
So i_1 = cos(377t+145) is in the II quadrant, and i_2=5cos(377-65 is in the IV quadrant). we start from the cos(wt) axis which is the + x-axis and go counterclockwise for polar angle so first we wee i_1 and then i_2. So i_1 is lagging hence i_2 leading.
Can anyone clarify this for me please?
 
Yes, we were told in class that result will be negative. And the most negative leads. So everything just contradicts here. This approach solved all the previous examples I tried. Now it all gets negated? Graphically how can you tell which one leads and which one follows? Its an angle 210 >180 so why not the other one lead?
 
If a phasor leads by angle A degrees then it also follows by angle 360-A degrees right?
But if it leads by -A then doesn't that mean it follows by A.

-65 degrees is the same as 295 degrees isn't it?
210 is the same as -150?

If the phasors were separated by 180 degrees, which would lead?
Which is the "most negative"?

i.e. is there a physical significance to "leading"?