Sledgehammer on pivot, using inertia, center of mass, finding speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a sledgehammer's center of mass as it swings down from a given angle. Key concepts include using conservation of energy, where the initial potential energy converts to kinetic energy at the horizontal position. The moment of inertia is provided, but some participants question its necessity in the calculations. The initial kinetic energy is zero since the hammer starts from rest, and potential energy is at its maximum when released. Ultimately, the focus is on applying energy conservation principles to solve for the final speed.
bocobuff
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sledgehammer with a mass of 2.60kg is connected to a frictionless pivot at the tip of its handle. The distance from the pivot to the center of mass is rcm=0.610m, and the moment of inertia about the center of mass is Icm=0.04kg*m2. If the hammer is released from rest at an angle of Θ=53.0° such that H=0.487m, what is the speed of the center of mass when it passes through horizontal?
prob34_sledgehammer.gif


Homework Equations


Thin rod, about end I=1/3M*rcm=0.529 kg*m2
I=Icm+Md2
Then some torque equations I don't know which to use, if any
τ=r*F*sinϕ
τ=m*r2
τgrav=-M*g*rcm
and α=τnet/I
And eventually I'll have to use either
vtan=ω*r or v=√arad*r
360°=2π radians

The Attempt at a Solution


I think Fgrav runs along H. ϕ=143° so Ftan=Fgrav*sin(-143°) where Fgrav=m*g.
I can also get I=Icm+M*rcm2 but then I get lost and don't know where to go with all the info. If I get α, I don't know how I would use rotational kinematics since there is no time given. Any clues to get going would help. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about conservation of energy here? That way you do not have to deal with any forces.

PE1+KE1=PE2+KE2

Also, why did you calculate the mass moment of inertia if it was given to you in the problem statement?
 
Saladsamurai said:
How about conservation of energy here? That way you do not have to deal with any forces.

PE1+KE1=PE2+KE2

Also, why did you calculate the mass moment of inertia if it was given to you in the problem statement?

That's good advice
 
You know that the initial velocity is=0 so KE1 is 0. It has only PE1.

At the horizontal, PE2=0, so you can find the velocity.
(If you do not understand why PE2=0, please ask and I will explain)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top