Sliding mode observer gain -- How do I find it?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the correct gain for a second-order sliding mode observer. Key points include the need to linearize both the plant and the observer to convert the equations into state space format for easier analysis. Participants suggest using methods similar to those for controller design, such as determining desired eigenvalues and applying Ackermann's formula to compute the necessary gains. There is also a mention of the Jacobian matrix as a crucial component in this process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of linearization and eigenvalue analysis in determining observer gains.
Payam30
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I have a 2nd order of sliding mode observer of the form:
\dot{\hat{x}} = \hat{f}(x,t) + \delta f + \Psi(u,y) +[ \frac{d \Omega}{dx}]^{-1} \upsilon
where ##\upsilon##:
\upsilon_1= \alpha_1 \lambda_1^{1/2} | y_1 -\hat{x}_1|^{1/2}*sign(y_1 -\hat{x}_1)
\upsilon_2= \alpha_2 \lambda_1*sign(\upsilon_1)
\upsilon_3= \alpha_3 \lambda_2^{1/2} | y_2 -\hat{x}_2|^{1/2}*sign(y_2 -\hat{x}_2)
\upsilon_4= \alpha_4 \lambda_2*sign(\upsilon_3)
...
where ##y_{1,2}## is the output and and ##x_{1,2}## are the estimations of measurable outputs. How do I find the correct gain of sliding mode observer?
##\delta f## is the uncertainties and ##[ \frac{d \Omega}{dx}]^{-1} ## is some mathematical stuff based on transformations. The main question is how do you find the proper gain of an observer by linearizing a system?
Do I linearize the plant and observer? and then what graphs should I look at to find the appripriate gains?
Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you convert your equations into state space format? It would be MUCH easier to solve if you can do that.
Is this for a class on non-linear controls, or just in general?

If this is a nonlinear controls problem, and the sign function implies, then yes you'll have to linear to get the function into state space format.

You would solve for an observer pretty much the same way you solve for a controller. You determine your desired eigenvalues and work backwards to determine the gains required. Ackermans formula for example is one way to do it.
 
Do you know how to compute your Jacobin matrix?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top