Slit diffraction: time between emission and detection of photon

m.e.t.a.
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
For this question I am considering a slit diffraction experiment set up as follows:

{Monochromatic source} ------> {Single slit} ------> {Diffraction grating with N slits} ------> {Screen with small movable detector}

The monochromatic light source emits photons one at a time. The principal interference maximum occurs at position x=0 on the screen. The detector is placed at some point, x, on the screen where the probability of detecting the photon is non-zero (also: x \ne 0). The detector detects all photons which arrive between positions x and x + \Delta x.

Photons are emitted one by one at a slow rate. Every time a photon is emitted, a stopwatch is started. If the photon is detected at the detector then the stopwatch is stopped and that time measurement, T is logged. If the photon is not detected then no measurement is recorded and the experiment is run again with a new photon.

The experiment is repeated many times. Finally, a probability distribution is plotted: {T} vs. {probability of T}. (I presume that this probability distribution will be approximately Gaussian in shape, although its exact shape is not important here.) This probability distribution will be centred around some mean value of T, {T_{mean}}.

Suppose that the experiment is run three times with different numbers of slits:

(i) N=1

(ii) N=2

(iii) N \to \infty


My question: will {T_{mean}} vary in each case? And if it will vary, how so?

(This is a stripped-down version of a longer question I posted a few days ago, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2695689#post2695689.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, {T_{mean}} will vary in each case. As the number of slits increases, the diffraction pattern becomes more complex and the probability of detecting the photon at a given position on the screen increases. This means that the mean time for detection, {T_{mean}}, will decrease. As N \to \infty, the probability of detecting the photon at any point on the screen is effectively 1, so {T_{mean}} will tend to 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top