Slower rotation curves at centre

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Rotation
AI Thread Summary
Galaxy rotation curves typically show constant velocities for stars and gas as distance from the center increases, but a drop in velocity occurs towards the center. This phenomenon suggests that the central regions of galaxies may behave like a solid mass, contrary to Kepler’s third law, which predicts higher velocities closer to the center. The need for significant mass outside the visible disk, attributed to dark matter, helps explain the observed flat rotation curves. Additionally, as one approaches the center, the rotation velocity may increase again, indicating the presence of a massive black hole. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately modeling mass distribution in galaxies.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
On galaxy rotation curves, the velocities of stars (or gas) rotating about their galactic centre remain fairly constant as the distance from the galactic centre increases.

But these rotation curves show a drop in rotation velocity towards the centre of the galaxy.

http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/rotcurve.html"

I accept that at the centre the rotation velocity must be zero but just out from the centre, Kepler’s third law predicts that the velocities should be greatest and then fall off with increasing distance.

Does this velocity profile exist because the centre of galaxies up to about 6kpc (in the hyperlinked curve) are a bit like a solid mass?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Galactic rotation curves are determined by the distribution of mass throughout the galaxy.

Kepler's laws were derived empirically for the solar system where nearly all the mass is in the centre, in the Sun.

To obtain the typical galactic rotation curve, where for a large proportion of the radial distance the rotation velocity remains fairly constant, you need a lot of mass outside the visible galactic disk. This is one of the reasons it is believed galactic haloes contain a lot of Dark Matter.

As the radius approaches the centre you are leaving more and more mass outside that radius and the rotational velocity drops off, however often very near the centre it often starts to increase again indicating that there is often a large mass at the centre itself, most probably a massive Black Hole.

I hope this helps.

Garth
 
Hi Garth,

When the mass of a galaxy is worked out from the centre to a given radius r, the velocity of rotation is determined at that radius. Then using Kepler’s 3rd law, the inner mass can be determined. The outer mass (beyond the radius r) seems to be ignored.

Are you saying that near the centre of a galaxy where there is a higher density of mass that the above method is not valid?
 
Well, first it is the rotation velocity that is measured, using the slope of the red shift across the galactic disc as presented (projected) onto our celestial sphere.

Then the mass within that orbit can be calculated. If the outer mass is spherically distributed, symmetrically about the galactic centre the contributions from opposite sectors cancel themselves out and they can be ignored.

However, if they are not spherically distributed then they have to be taken into account, this is the case with real galaxies.

The actual Galaxy rotation curve is the data on which a model of the mass distribution has to be constructed.

Garth
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top