Small problem, can anyone help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vlad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a complex analysis problem is presented regarding the nature of singularities for the function g(z) = 1/f(z) when b is an isolated essential singular point for f(z). It is clarified that since f(z) has an essential singularity at b, g(z) cannot be classified as having a pole or removable singularity at that point. Instead, g(z) may exhibit an essential singularity as well, although it is noted that it is not guaranteed that g(z) will have a singular point at b. The conversation emphasizes the behavior of f(z) near its singularity and its implications for g(z). Overall, the analysis suggests that g(z) is likely to have an essential singularity at b.
Vlad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just got this complex analysis problem that's bugging me. If b in U is an isolated essentially singular point for f(z) in U, what type of singularity can
g(z) = 1/f(z) have? Is it just an essentially singular pt for g(z) as well, it's not a pole or removable singularity is it? Can anyone help me with this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe you're right. Since U is an essential singularity, f(z) need not approach infinity, as z approaches U. So, if f(z) = w at U, then g(z) will not, in general, go to infinity or to zero. Of course, it's not clear that g(z) must even have a singular point at U, but it looks like it will.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top