MHB Smallest possible area of triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To find the smallest possible area of a right triangle with base and height measurements of 2.7 cm and 3.4 cm, both rounded to one decimal place, the base could be as low as 2.6 cm and the height as low as 3.3 cm. The area is calculated using the formula (1/2) base times height. Substituting the minimum values, the smallest area would be (1/2) * 2.6 cm * 3.3 cm. This results in an area of 4.29 cm².
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to work out this question, and the answer I'm coming up with isn't right. Can anyone help me understand the calculation used to work this out?
 

Attachments

  • area Q.jpg
    area Q.jpg
    10.5 KB · Views: 122
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can't read that nor enlarge it. Can't you just type the probelm in?
 
HallsofIvy said:
I can't read that nor enlarge it. Can't you just type the probelm in?
Yes, sorry it's not larger in the browser. The question is, in this right angled triangle, both measurements (2.7cm and 3.4cm) are given correct to 1 decimal place (d.p). What is the smallest possible area of the triangle?

Thank you :)
 
Okay. I presume you know that the area of such a right triangle is (1/2) base times height. Since the base is 2.7 cm "given to one decimal place", it could be as low as 2.6 cm. The height is 3.4 cm "given to one decimal place" so it could be as low as 3.3 cm. Now can you calculate the smallest area?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Just chatting with my son about Maths and he casually mentioned that 0 would be the midpoint of the number line from -inf to +inf. I wondered whether it wouldn’t be more accurate to say there is no single midpoint. Couldn’t you make an argument that any real number is exactly halfway between -inf and +inf?

Similar threads

Back
Top