Smarter way to solve a continuity equation?

stufletcher
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The density in 3-D space of a certain kind of conserved substance is given by
\[\rho (x,y,z, t) = At^{-\frac{3}{2}}e^{-\frac{r^2}{4kt}}\]

where \mathbf r = x\mathbf i + y\mathbf j +z\mathbf k and r = |\mathbf r|. The corresponding flux vector is given by
\mathbf J(\mathbf r, t) = Bt^{-\frac{5}{2}}e^{-\frac{r^2}{4kt}}\mathbf r
Here, A, B, k and positive constants.

Homework Equations



Show that $\rho, \mathbf J$ satisfy the conservation equation \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+ \nabla \cdot \mathbf J = 0 only if $ A = 2B$

The Attempt at a Solution


So I've looked at this, found the derivative for the density function, had a fair play with the div function, I'm just wondering if there is a smarter way to solve this then actually deriving the partial derivative and the div function and re-arranging? I have a feeling there is something inherent, for example like the divergence theorum, that i can use?

mind you in the time it took me to get the tex working i could have solved the thing, but I'm still curious
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One smarter way would be by using (first understanding the derivation, of course) Eqs. (49,50) from the entry "http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalCoordinates.html" ".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm. To be honest I don't know where to start. For example, how to i manage the position vector? Do i replace x, y, z with r cos \theta sin \phi etc, then do the divergence? It starts to look very messy ... t^{-\frac{5}{2}}e^{-\frac{r}{4kt}} r cos \theta sin \phi for the x component for example
 
stufletcher said:
Hmm. To be honest I don't know where to start. For example, how to i manage the position vector? Do i replace x, y, z with r cos \theta sin \phi etc, then do the divergence? It starts to look very messy ... t^{-\frac{5}{2}}e^{-\frac{r}{4kt}} r cos \theta sin \phi for the x component for example

r in the exponential is not the position vector. It is its length - one of the coordinates of the spherical system. It will stay as such. \theta,\phi simply do not appear in the formula - which simplifies the calculations.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top