SN 1a Progenitor Classes: Statistical Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The paper presents a statistical analysis suggesting the existence of at least two distinct progenitor classes for Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), supported by observations of Na i D absorption features. It finds that SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D absorption are generally more luminous and have broader light curves, indicating a potential connection to younger stellar populations. The authors propose that these features may arise from circumstellar material linked to the progenitor system, with implications for understanding cosmological distance measurements. The discussion also raises the possibility of a third class of SNe Ia, particularly the 'super bright' category, which may affect distance estimates. Overall, the findings highlight the complexity of SNe Ia progenitor models and their impact on cosmological studies.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
In this paper, A statistical analysis of circumstellar material in Type Ia supernovae; http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.3899v1.pdf, the authors make a case for separate progenitor classes for SN 1a. It looks persuasive. It appears they suggest the double degenerate model along with an accretion model.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Interesting paper, thank you Chronos.

From that paper,
We present a summary that suggests there are at least two distinct populations of normal, cosmologically useful SNe Ia.
Remembering the original confusion over galactic distances that arose because it wasn't realized that there were two classes of Cepheid variables, which were and are used as 'standard candles', and that SN Ia are today used as standard candles measuring cosmological distances, might the possible existence of two classes of SNe Ia lead to a similar confusion over cosmological expansion rates?

5 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have presented a sample of 17 low-redshift SNe Ia observed with the XShooter intermediate resolution spectrograph on the VLT. We conducted a search for narrow Na i D absorption profiles in these spectra and, where present, have measured its blueshift (or non-blueshift) relative to the systemic velocity of the SN in its host galaxy. We combined these new data with events from the literature to form a single sample of 32 SNe Ia with intermediate-high resolution spectra and light curve data. We also measured the strength of the narrow Na i D absorption features through pEW measurements and investigated the connection to SN observables. Our main conclusions are:
(i) Combining our new data with the S11 sample, we find an excess of SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D absorption features over those with no-blueshifted Na i D, with ∼20 per cent of SNe Ia having an additional blueshifted Na i D absorption feature.
(ii) SNe Ia with Na i D absorption features in their spectra have, on average, broader light curves (or higher stretches) and are more luminous events than SNe Ia without Na i D absorption features.
(iii) SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D absorption features are most likely to be found in late-type galaxies containing younger stellar populations. No SNe Ia in our sample with blueshifted Na i D were found in an E/S0 galaxy.
(iv) SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D absorption features show stronger Na i D pEWs than those without blueshifted features, suggestive of an additional contribution to the Na i D absorption from CSM.
(v) Within the sample of SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D absorption, we find that the strength of the ‘blueshifted’ a i D absorption features correlates with SN B − V colour at maximum, strongly suggesting this material is associated with the progenitor system.
(vi) We find no statistically significant preference for SNe Ia with blueshifted Na i D features to have higher Si ii 6355 Å velocities than SNe Ia without blueshifted Na i D features.
The simplest explanation for the presence of additional blueshifted Na i D absorption features in SN Ia spectra is that it arises due to CSM from the progenitor system of the SN. This suggests a progenitor channel where one would expect outflowing shell-like structures - the most obvious being the SD scenario. A SD origin for the CSMis supported by clear observational evidence with recurrent nova systems being observed to show time-varying Na i D features very similar to those in some SNe Ia. However, some recent DD models may now also produce similar narrow absorption features, but not currently at the rate necessary to explain
our results.
Table 5 summarises the observational evidence for two distinct families of ‘normal’ SNe Ia with different light curve, spectral, and host galaxy properties. The rates of the different channels are consistent with one population with high luminosity, short delay-timesand evidence for outflowing material, with the other population displaying no Na i D absorption features, low luminosity and long delay-times indicative of an older population. Whether these ‘families’ correspond to separate progenitor channels (SD and DD) or
can be explained within the framework of one channel (i.e. different types of companion stars in the SD channel) is still very much a topic under debate.
(Emphasis mine)
Garth
 
Actually, I believe there are at least 3 [if not more] classes of SN Ia, but, I don't wish to divert discussion. They [and understandably] did not address the unusual 'super bright' category. My suspicion is the super bright class [e.g., SN 2007bi, 2006gy] has biased distance estimates.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top