So, the question could be: Is the Formula for Specific Angular Momentum Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyle91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for specific angular momentum and its application in calculating eccentricity in orbital mechanics. The formula presented for eccentricity, e = h² / μEarth / (radius at perigee) - 1, raises concerns about the calculation of specific angular momentum, h. It is clarified that h is indeed specific angular momentum, defined as angular momentum per unit mass, calculated as h = (radius at perigee) * (velocity at perigee). The absence of a mass component in the formula is noted, but it is emphasized that specific angular momentum is often used for convenience in orbital calculations. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate application of the formulas in orbital mechanics.
Kyle91
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey guys

Well I'm doing a group assignment based on orbital mechanics and my partner found a formula for eccentricity which is:

e = h2 / μEarth / (radius at perigee) - 1

Anyway when calculating h he said it was angular momentum:

h = (radius at perigee)*(velocity at perigee)

But it can't be because there's no mass component, so I'm worried we used the eccentricity formula wrong. Is the above formula for h correct? If so, what is it called?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
h is specific angular momentum. That is, the angular momentum per unit mass of the orbiting object. Multiply h by mass to find the actual angular momentum.

It's often more convenient to work with specific angular momentum because in almost all cases the various characteristics of an orbit don't depend upon the orbiting body's mass when it's negligible compared to its primary.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top