Sodium Ferrocyanide - 60 year old antique chemset

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sagu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sodium Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the safety and chemical properties of an antique chemistry set from the 1950s, specifically concerning sodium ferrocyanide and its potential reactions. It raises questions about the risk of photodecomposition or reactions with acids like HCl or H2SO4 that could produce hydrogen cyanide. While there is a consensus that sodium ferrocyanide is not particularly dangerous if handled with caution, there are concerns about the presence of other chemicals in the kit, such as sodium bisulfate. The conversation touches on historical safety standards, noting that while they were lower in the past, current regulations are perceived as excessively stringent. Personal experiences are shared regarding the smell of hydrogen cyanide, emphasizing the importance of safety precautions, such as not working alone with cyanides. The discussion concludes with a mention of chlorine trifluoride, highlighting its extreme toxicity and reactive nature, underscoring the need for careful handling of hazardous materials.
Sagu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, a friend just picked up an antique chemistry set from the 50s, containing all sorts of interesting stuff - among it sodium ferrocyanide. Out of curiosity, can this photodecompose or react with an acid such as HCl or H2SO4 to produce hydrogen cyanide? Any risk of cracking it open without ventilation?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I would not mix it with acid, but other than that it is not especially dangerous, as long as treated seriously.
 
Borek said:
I would not mix it with acid, but other than that it is not especially dangerous, as long as treated seriously.

Thanks. Interestingly, the kit is labeled as containing no toxic or explosive chemicals, yet there's definitely some stuff I wouldn't be handling without gloves and a mask. I find it interesting that it contains sodium bisulfate and sodium ferrocyanide together.
 
This is sad. I mean - while obviously safety standards 60 years ago were much lower, and they resulted in some accidents, they are IMHO too high today, to the absurd level.
 
It's possible to make hydrogen cyanide and take a cautious whiff of it. It's a neat experiment to see if you are genetically able to smell hydrogen cyanide. In fact, I've done just that: I used potassium ferricyanide and concentrated sulfuric acid in a small test tube, then carefully wafted some of the blue fumes. I'm one of the people who can smell it (I was really itching to figure this out). Looking back, though, it was a bit reckless, and I shouldn't have done it alone (a good rule when working with cyanides is to never work alone).

Except for the acid thing, ferricyanides and ferrocyanides are perfectly safe. I wouldn't handle them like a teddy bear though.
 
My favorite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine_trifluoride

"It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that's the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water — with which it reacts explosively.

It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off... the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes."
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top