Solar and Lunar exposure tables information

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights valuable exposure tables for solar and lunar photography, emphasizing their accuracy and usefulness for astrophotographers, particularly beginners. Links to specific resources for solar exposures, lunar exposures, image size, and nebular filters are provided, along with guidance for Newtonian telescope modifications. Users express appreciation for the shared links and note challenges with a popular scope design program, suggesting the provided resources may offer better results. The exposure tables have proven effective, as demonstrated by a successful photo taken during an annular eclipse. Overall, the shared information is deemed beneficial for those interested in astrophotography.
Labguy
Science Advisor
Messages
731
Reaction score
7
I don't remember if I have ever posted these here before, but if I did it was a very long time ago. Some of these are worth keeping for you astrophoto buffs out there and I have found the exposure tables to be spot-on. For f/ratios not listed, it is easy to see where to start for bracketing.

For solar exposures, non-eclipse:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/SolarEx.htm

For lunar exposures:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/moon2.htm

For image size on film, CCD, anything:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/Image%20Size.htm

For use with the popular nebular filters:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/knisley.htm

And the next two are for the "Newtonian guys" who might want to build a scope or make changes to a commercial scope if needed:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/diagonal.htm
http://www.users.qwest.net/~sherrodstephen/secondary_offset.htm

There is one well-known program on the internet named "Scope Design" (or something similar) that is supposed to give all Newtonian parameters for tube length, diagonal size, mirror placement, focuser height, etc., etc. but I have entered the info it requires many times and it is just plain wrong!

Hope the links I listed are useful to at least some of you, especially beginners. This centerline photo of an annular eclipse was taken using the solar exposure table with no bracketing needed.

Annular3.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks for sharing these links! They look really useful, especially for those of us who are just getting started in astrophotography. I haven't had much luck with the Scope Design program either, so I'll definitely be giving your links a try. Thanks again!
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
152
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top