Solar Panel Wattage: Altitude Effects Explored

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the increase in solar panel wattage per cubic meter as altitude increases, noting that maximum solar insolation at sea level is slightly over 1 kilowatt/m². There is curiosity about the noticeable increase in solar energy capture at altitudes like 12 km, where sunlight is less obstructed by the atmosphere. Participants mention the importance of atmospheric absorption and scattering, which diminishes solar energy at lower altitudes. While theoretical resources are referenced, there is a call for empirical studies or data, particularly from weather balloons, to provide real-life measurements of solar wattage at various elevations. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate research to understand solar energy potential at higher altitudes.
OtherRealm
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
At what altitude does a solar panel see a noticeable increase in wattage/cubic meter if it is lifted into the air? I understand the maximum is a bit over 1 kilowatt/meter2 at sea level (not actually converted to usable energy, this is much less and depends on the technology) but that this amount obviously increases as an object reaches the exosphere and beyond. Would there be a noticeable increase at say, 12km or at the top of the thermosphere?
I found one useful site: http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~brooksdr/DRB_web_page/papers/UsingTheSun/using.htm but it is talking mainly theoretical. Does anyone know of studies that have been done to look at real life w/m^2 at various levels of elevation? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


OtherRealm said:
At what altitude does a solar panel see a noticeable increase in wattage/cubic meter if it is lifted into the air? I understand the maximum is a bit over 1 kilowatt/meter2 at sea level (not actually converted to usable energy, this is much less and depends on the technology) but that this amount obviously increases as an object reaches the exosphere and beyond. Would there be a noticeable increase at say, 12km or at the top of the thermosphere?
I found one useful site: http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~brooksdr/DRB_web_page/papers/UsingTheSun/using.htm but it is talking mainly theoretical. Does anyone know of studies that have been done to look at real life w/m^2 at various levels of elevation? Thanks.

Welcome to the PF.

I googled Insolation Versus Altitude, which took me to a wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insolation
"Direct insolation is equal to the solar constant minus the atmospheric losses due to absorption and scattering."

Following the link for absorption got me here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_(electromagnetic_radiation )

which had a figure that linked to this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atmospheric_electromagnetic_opacity.svg
"File:Atmospheric electromagnetic opacity.svg"

Does that figure help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:


OtherRealm said:
Would there be a noticeable increase at say, 12km or at the top of the thermosphere?
Only because that 12km altitude is still in the stratosphere. Once you get above the stratosphere you essentially have unfettered full sunlight.
 


Just using the key words insolation versus altitude has given a few more relevant results (goes to show that having the right search terms in research is key), but I have not found any hard numbers for solar wattage at the top of the troposphere (I mistakenly used thermosphere in my first post). Does anyone have weather balloon data or something of the like and measured insolation levels at this altitude? Thanks.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top