Calculating the Solid Angle Subtended by a Disc: How to Find ω?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the solid angle ω subtended by a disc of radius a at a point P, located a distance z from its center along the axis. The user presents two formulas for ω: the online source states ω = 2π (1 - cos α), while the user derives ω = π tan²α. The user clarifies that "Area" refers to the area on the sphere's surface defined by the disc, not the disc's area itself. The conversation seeks guidance on how to accurately determine this area for the calculation. Understanding the correct approach to finding this area is essential for resolving the discrepancy between the two formulas.
brotherbobby
Messages
750
Reaction score
169
The problem is to find out the solid angle ω subtended by a disc of radius a at a point P distant z from its centre along its axis. α is the semi-vertical angle of the disc at the point P in question.

The answer is supposed to be ω = 2π (1 - cos α), according to an online text. However, I find that ω = (Area) / (perpendicular distance)2 = (πa2)/z2 = π tan2α.

I mark my answer in red, in contrast to the "correct" answer in blue.

Any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"Area" is not the area of the disc, but the area delimited by the disk on the surface of the sphere with the center in P.
 
Thanks mate.

Now how do I find this area?
 
I think it is a good exercise to calculate it:

800px-Spherical_Cap.svg.png
800px-Spherical_Cap.svg.png
 
  • Like
Likes SHREYAN SAHA
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top