Solution help for the Geodesic Equation

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the geodesic path of an asteroid entering Earth's atmosphere, one must start with the initial conditions of position and 4-velocity. The momentum can be expressed as p_{0+} = mass*[v_{1},v_{2},v_{3},v_{4}], and the relevant geometry is defined by the Schwarzschild metric in Riemann Space with zero torsion. The Christoffel Symbol serves as the affinity, while the Ricci tensor remains null, indicating non-zero curvature. The approach involves formulating x^{i} to solve the second-order geodesic differential equation, using the integral that accounts for the initial conditions. This method requires a piece-meal analysis of the geodesic, leveraging the geodesic equation to reduce the number of unknowns.
Jack3145
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Let’s say an asteroid is about to enter earth’s atmosphere(it will burn up of course). The initially sitting is at:

point = [x_{0},y_{0},z_{0},t_{0}] = [r_{0},\\theta_{0},\\phi_{0},t_{0}]

With a 4-velocity:

V = [v_{1},v_{2},v_{3},v_{4}]

The momentum at 0+

p_{0+} = mass*V = mass*[v_{1},v_{2},v_{3},v_{4}]

The Riemann Geometry is Riemann Space with Torsion = 0. The metric is the Schwarzschild metric. Affinity is the Christoffel Symbol. Curvature is non-zero. And, the Ricci tensor is null.

My question is how do you formulate x^{i} to attempt solve for the path, "s" in the second-order geodesic differential equation from the given initial 4-velocity vector and starting point?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I am looking for how to solve the geodesic path, I. Something like this except taking into account initial conditions:

I = \int[(1-2m/r)^{-1} + r^{2}(d\theta/dr)^{2} + r^{2}(sin\theta)^{2}(d\phi/dr)^{2} - (1-2m/r)(dt/dr)^{2}]^{1/2} dr
 
Last edited:
The geodesic is a graph of many curves. You have to go piece-meal or one part at a time. Use the Geodesic equation to lesson the amount of unknowns:
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top