Solution to Equation: Rearrange beta in terms of alpha

  • Thread starter Thread starter richthegray
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation beta = alpha + tan-1(0.5(tan(alpha))) presents challenges in rearranging to express alpha in terms of beta. Some participants believe that solving for alpha in this context is not feasible using elementary functions. The discussion highlights the complexity of the equation and questions the necessity of finding a solution. Overall, the difficulty in rearranging the equation is a central concern among participants. The conversation emphasizes the limitations of traditional algebraic methods in this case.
richthegray
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been struggling with the solution to the following equation, i know its easy but just cannot solve it. I need to rearrange it to have alpha in terms of beta.

beta = alpha+ tan-1(0.5(tan(alpha )))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
...i know its easy

I think it is quite difficult actually.
 
Last edited:
If tan-1 is supposed to be arctan or \tan^{-1} then it doesn't appear to be possibly to solve it in terms of elementary functions.

Why do you need to solve it?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top