How to Solve Laplace's Equation for a Point Charge Near a Grounded Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RickRazor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace's equation
RickRazor
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Moved from technical forum so the template is missing
A point charge q is situated at a distance d from a grounded conducting plane of infinite extent. Find the potential at different points in space.

I want to solve this problem without using the image charge idea.

I assumed azimuthal symmetry and took the zonal harmonics. And we know that as r tends to infinite the potential in the opposite side of the conducting plane goes to a constant. So we are left with the Pn(theta)r^{-(n+1)} terms.

$$V(r,\theta)=A_1 + \frac{C_1}{r} + \frac{C_2}{r^2}\cos(\theta)) + \frac{C_3}{2}(3\cos^2(\theta) - 1) + ...$$

When cos(theta)=d/r, the potential vanishes. So we get the condition:

$$A_1 + \frac{C_1}{r} + \frac{C_2}{r^2}\frac{d}{r} + \frac{C_3}{2}(3\frac{d^2}{r^2} - 1) + ... =0$$

for all r

Now how to progress further? How do I get the coefficients
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-5-27_10-35-11.png
    upload_2017-5-27_10-35-11.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you are answering the same question in the image - it just asks for the total charge on the plane (which you can compute from the image solution). What is the real question you are trying to answer?

Jason
 
By the way, if you want to solve without images, you will have better luck I think if you use Cartesian or cylindrical coordinates since your boundary is a plane. It will be fairly involved - more difficult than the kinds of problems in a typical undergrad (in US) textbook like Griffiths. For fun I solved it using integral transform techniques and contour integration, but other approaches could be used. I'm pretty sure that whatever way you solve it, instead of a discrete sum of functions you will find a continuous sum (an integral). EDIT: the integral can be evaluated to yield the image solution, of course.

Jason
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RickRazor
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top