Solve Ballistic Pendulum Homework: Conservation of Energy & Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a ballistic pendulum problem involving a wood block and a bullet. The conservation of energy and momentum principles are applied, but the user encounters difficulties in calculating the height increase of the center of mass after the collision. They initially miscalculate the height "h" as 1.3*cos35, realizing it should instead be based on the center of mass of the system. The user seeks clarification on whether to utilize the center of mass for calculations and expresses uncertainty about alternative methods to approach the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in analyzing the motion of a pendulum with mass.
Cfem
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.3 kg wood block hangs from the bottom of a 1.3 kg, 1.3 m long rod. The block and rod form a pendulum that swings on a frictionless pivot at the top end of the rod. A 12 g bullet is fired into the block, where it sticks, causing the pendulum to swing out to a 35 degrees.


Homework Equations


Conservation of Energy.
Conservation of Momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



(1/2)(m)(v^2) = mgh

Drawing a triangle, h is 1.3 * cos 35 = 1.06m

So (1/2)(v^2) = (9.8)(1.06)
v = 4.568 m/s

Conservation of momentum:

(mB)(vB) = (mB + mP)(v)
(.012)vB = (2.3+.012)(4.568)
vB = 10.561 / .012 = 880.21 m/s

Not sure where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"h" has to be the amount by which the system's center of mass increased in height. It's not equal to 1.3*cos35 because the pendulum itself isn't massless.
 
Note: actually, h isn't equal to 1.3*cos35 even if the pendulum were massless.
 
h would have been L - Lcos35 if it were massless. That's my slip up.

But back to the question at hand, though, I'm lost now. Would I have to use the center of mass of the pendulum and the block? That sounds complicated.

Is there another way I could do it?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top