Solve Charging RC Circuit: Find Capacitor Charge at t1

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the charge on a capacitor in an RC circuit after a switch is closed. The initial conditions state that the capacitor is uncharged, and the voltage difference between points A and B is given as 2.00 volts. Participants debate the validity of using the equation 2 volts = (q/c) - I3R3 to find the charge, with some asserting that the potential difference cannot realistically be 2 volts given the circuit's constraints. Ultimately, one user successfully calculates the charge as 7.2nC by correctly applying the exponential decay formula for current and charge over time. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the application of circuit rules and the implications of the given voltage difference.
mrshappy0
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Switch is initially opened with the capacitor uncharged. At t=0 the switch is clsoed. At time=t1 later, the potential difference between A and B is 2.00volts
Find the charge on the capacitor at time t1.

R=10,000ohms
C=2.4nF
Vb=12volts
VA->B-=2.00volts


Homework Equations


I(t)=(V/R)*e^(-t/RC)
q(t)=CV(1-e^(-t/RC))
C=Q/V


The Attempt at a Solution


RC was correctly found to be 40microSeconds.So then the goal is to find the time at t1. The 2volts across A and B must be important to finding t1.
So I assumed that the voltage drop from A-B must be equal to the voltage drop for R3. Thus 2Volt/R=I3.

Then I used I3 to find t1: I3=(V/R)*e^(-t/RC) --> solving for t and then plugging into q(t).
Does this seem right or is my logic wrong?
 

Attachments

  • ohms.png
    ohms.png
    4 KB · Views: 469
Physics news on Phys.org
RC was correctly found to be 40microSeconds.
I don't think this helps. You do not have a simple RC circuit, the charging will show a more complex time-dependence.
You can use the usual circuit rules to get the charge, you don't even need the time.

So I assumed that the voltage drop from A-B must be equal to the voltage drop for R3.
This would correspond to zero voltage drop at the capacitor...
 
1) I mean RC as in the time constant= total resistance*capacitance = 5/3R*C

"You can use the usual circuit rules to get the charge..."
How do you do this?
2volts = (q/c) - I3R3 and solve for q?
 
mrshappy0 said:
1) I mean RC as in the time constant= total resistance*capacitance = 5/3R*C
The voltage drop at your RC part is not constant.

"You can use the usual circuit rules to get the charge..."
How do you do this?
2volts = (q/c) - I3R3 and solve for q?
Step by step. You can calculate the voltage drop at the right transistor. Based on this, you can calculate the current there, and so on.
 
"The voltage drop at your RC part is not constant."
yeah but isn't \tau (time-constant) always constant from the time the switch is closed to a "long time after"?"Step by step. You can calculate the voltage drop at the right transistor. Based on this, you can calculate the current there, and so on."
I assume you meant resistor not transistor?
I'm confused. Is the above equation 2volts = (q/c) - I3R3 not correct. I don't see how you couldn't just find q from this.
 
It looks to me like there's something wrong with the problem statement. I don't see how the magnitude of the potential difference between points A and B can ever be 2.00V after the switch is closed. It should only be able to range between the values afforded by two conditions: capacitor is a short (uncharged); capacitor is an open (charged).
 
I just found an answer (without solution) and it said it is supposed to be 7.2nC. Using the first idea I had, I pretty much got the answer with t1=11.5microseconds :

**"RC was correctly found to be 40microSeconds.So then the goal is to find the time at t1. The 2volts across A and B must be important to finding t1.
So I assumed that the voltage drop from A-B must be equal to the voltage drop for R3. Thus 2Volt/R=I3.

Then I used I3 to find t1: I3=(V/R)*e^(-t/RC) --> solving for t and then plugging into q(t).
Does this seem right or is my logic wrong?"**

but... I become completely confused by mfb's suggestions.gneill, why can't it ever be 2volts if the battery is 12volts?
 
mrshappy0 said:
gneill, why can't it ever be 2volts if the battery is 12volts?

Calculate the potential difference when you replace the capacitor with a short. Calculate it again when you replace the capacitor with an open circuit. Does 2V lie between the values?
 
gneill said:
It looks to me like there's something wrong with the problem statement. I don't see how the magnitude of the potential difference between points A and B can ever be 2.00V after the switch is closed. It should only be able to range between the values afforded by two conditions: capacitor is a short (uncharged); capacitor is an open (charged).

That is true, UAB never can be 2 V.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #10
mrshappy0 said:
"The voltage drop at your RC part is not constant."
yeah but isn't \tau (time-constant) always constant from the time the switch is closed to a "long time after"?
At every moment, you can calculate τ, but you cannot use it in the exponential formula.
"Step by step. You can calculate the voltage drop at the right transistor. Based on this, you can calculate the current there, and so on."
I assume you meant resistor not transistor?
Oh, right.
I'm confused. Is the above equation 2volts = (q/c) - I3R3 not correct. I don't see how you couldn't just find q from this.
It is, but you have two unknown values there. You have to find I3 first.

ehild said:
That is true, UAB never can be 2 V.

egó
Interesting, I did not test this. The capacitor would have to have a reverse charge.
 
  • #11
***"Oh, right.
I'm confused. Is the above equation 2volts = (q/c) - I3R3 not correct. I don't see how you couldn't just find q from this.
It is, but you have two unknown values there. You have to find I3 first."***

Right, I did that and I solved for q. This does not come out to the answer provided [7.2nC charge on the capacitor]BUT! When I the following:
I3=I0(e^(-t/\tau)), solve for t.
Solve for q(t)=q0(1-e^(-t/\tau))
I got 7.2nC...

So now I'm just confused because you say this is not the correct use of the formula.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Moving on for now
 
Back
Top