Solve Efficiency Problem: Heat Water in 1000 W Electric Kettle

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnerd7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
AI Thread Summary
To determine the time required for a 1000 W electric kettle to heat 1.0 L of water from 10 °C to boiling, the effective power used is 630 W due to 63% efficiency. The initial calculation yielded 600 seconds or 10 minutes, but the mass of the iron kettle must also be considered for accuracy. The correct approach involves adding the energy needed to heat both the water and the kettle, but some participants argue that the kettle's mass is irrelevant since only the power output affects the heating time. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial calculation of 600 seconds is valid, as the kettle's efficiency directly determines the energy transferred to the water. The discussion highlights the importance of clarifying problem specifications in physics calculations.
physicsnerd7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the amount of time it will take a 1000 W electric kettle to heat up 1.0 L of water to boiling point if the water starts at 10 °C and the kettle is made from 400 g of iron. The transfer of heat energy from the kettle to the water is 63%.

Homework Equations


P = W/Δt
Q = mcΔT

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so what i was thinking was find 63% of the 1000 W electric kettle and then that is the power used to bring the water to a boil so I did -

Pfor water = 1000W x 0.63
= 630 W

then I would use this power in the formula P = W/Δt to find time so I did -

Δt = (mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water) ) / 630 W

= (1kg x 4.2E3 J/kgC x (100 C - 10 C )) / 630 W
= 600s ||or|| 10 min

apparently this answer is wrong because I am suppose to incorporate the mass of the iron kettle but I don't know how. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the correct equation for the energy needed to heat the water mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water). Write similar equation for the energy needed to heat the iron. What laws do you know about energy?

PS: I believe they are saying that the 63% figure applies between the kettle and the water not the element and the water.
 
Last edited:
Δt = (mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water) + miron x ciron x(Tf iron - Ti iron)) / 630 W

Is ^ this correct then. I know that energy can't be created or destroyed and that it is only transferred from one form to another.
 
The more I think about this problem the more I think it's badly specified and your first answer based on 63% of 1000W could be justified.
 
CWatters said:
The more I think about this problem the more I think it's badly specified and your first answer based on 63% of 1000W could be justified.
I agree. Based on the masses and specific heats, you'd think 96% of the heat would go into the water (did I get that right?). If only 63% went that way then the rest has been radiated/convected away to the room. This leaves the OP calculation as the only route to the answer. The mass and composition of the kettle are irrelevant.
 
Okay so then the 600 s answer is right then because the only thing affecting the heating up of the water is the amount of power the kettle has and not what the kettle is made from. And since the kettle is only 63% efficient then only 630W is going towards heating the water.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top