Solve for Length of Friction-Ridden Ice Patch | Work-Energy Theorem Hint

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingsean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work-energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem using the work-energy theorem to determine the length of a friction-ridden ice patch. A skater initially moving at 3.0 m/s experiences a 45% speed reduction due to a friction force that is 25% of her weight. Participants suggest using the kinetic energy equation and incorporating the work done by friction to find the solution, emphasizing that mass (m) will cancel out. One user calculated the length to be 1.46 meters but expressed uncertainty about the final velocity calculation. The correct answer, according to the book, is 1.5 meters, indicating a need for clarity in the approach to the problem.
kingsean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been working on a problem and I'm stumped :| I'm usually pretty good at deriving the equations for problems and solving them once I find out what I need to be solved. But this one is a bit too ambiguous for me, and I'm looking for a few hints :) Anything is appreciated!

On an essentially friction-less, horizontal ice rink, a skater moving at 3.0m/s encounters a rough patch that reduces her speed by 45% due to a friction force that is 25% of her weight. Use the work-energy theorem to find the length of this rough patch.


I've tried a few methods but, alas, no answer. The back of the book says 1.5m if that is of any assistance.

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just solve the problem using "m" for the mass and it should cancel out in the end.

You know the initial energy will just be the kinetic energy (K) and that will equal the final kinetic energy plus work done by friction ( K+W_f )
 
dav2008 said:
Just solve the problem using "m" for the mass and it should cancel out in the end.

You know the initial energy will just be the kinetic energy (K) and that will equal the final kinetic energy plus work done by friction ( K+W_f )


I've taken this into consideration, but my answers still end up being too high or too low :(
 
I worked it out and got 1.46 meters as the answer.

I said that the final velocity was 3*.45 (although the wording would suggest that it should be 3-(3+.45) but that gives me 1.28)

Can you show how you're doing it and what answer you get?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top