Solve Geometric Optics: Convex & Concave Lenses, Focal Lengths

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a geometric optics problem involving a convex lens and a concave lens placed 30 cm apart. The focal lengths are defined as (x+5) cm for the convex lens and x cm for the concave lens, with a light bulb positioned 10 cm from the convex lens. The key point of contention is whether to assign a negative sign to the focal length of the concave lens, which is necessary because it diverges light. Ultimately, it is clarified that x represents a positive modulus value, and the solution provided is deemed correct, confirming that the focal length of the concave lens should indeed be considered as -x. Understanding the behavior of the lenses is essential for accurately applying the lens formula.
cyt91
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a convex lens of focal length of (x+5) cm and a concave lens of focal length x cm.
The 2 lenses are placed 30 cm apart coaxially i.e along the same axis with the convex lens on the left while the concave lens is on the right. A light bulb is placed to the left of the convex lens at a distance of 10 cm. It is observed that light rays that emerges from the concave lens are parallel to each other. Find the value of x.

Homework Equations



\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the light rays that emerges from the concave lens are parallel,the light rays that emerges from the convex lens converges at the focal point of the concave lens.
Therefore,

\frac{1}{x+5}=\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{30-x}
x^{2}-45x+100=0

Solving for x, x=2.344 or 4.266

The answer given is x=2.655.

Part of the solution given involves the equation

\frac{1}{x+5}=\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{30+x}

instead of \frac{1}{x+5}=\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{30-x}

They've added a negative sign to the focal length of the concave lens i.e. -x instead of x.

Is the solution correct?

I feel the solution is wrong because we shouldn't add a negative sign to x (the focal length of the concave lens) since x is a variable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is right, not only if you were to go through the geometric math of it, but you should also be able to simply think about it. A convex lens takes parallel light and converges it, while a concave lens takes parallel light and diverges it. They behave opposite of one another.

Basically it means you used the wrong focus point by making the focus on the the wrong side of the concave lens.
 
Mindscrape said:
Yes, that is right, not only if you were to go through the geometric math of it, but you should also be able to simply think about it. A convex lens takes parallel light and converges it, while a concave lens takes parallel light and diverges it. They behave opposite of one another.

Basically it means you used the wrong focus point by making the focus on the the wrong side of the concave lens.

But x is a variable. If it's a variable shouldn't the negative sign take care of itself?
E.g. x^2+6x+5=0
solving, (x+1)(x+5)=0
x=-1,-5

But,if I know x is negative (as in the case of the focal length of the concave lens), I couldn't simply add a negative sign in front of x :

(-x)^2+6(-x)+5=0
x^2-6x+5=0
(x-1)(x-5)=0
x=1,5 (a different set of solution)

So is the solution correct?
 
Yes the solution is correct.
The variable x given is actually a modulus value - always positive. Think of it this way - if x were the variable you were saying it could be positive or negative but not both at the same time. Then the lenses would either be concave or convex but not both.
Actually x is distance and by definition a +ve quantity so when we say a concave lens has focal length x it is actually -x.
 
aim1732 said:
Yes the solution is correct.
The variable x given is actually a modulus value - always positive. Think of it this way - if x were the variable you were saying it could be positive or negative but not both at the same time. Then the lenses would either be concave or convex but not both.
Actually x is distance and by definition a +ve quantity so when we say a concave lens has focal length x it is actually -x.

Ok. I get your point. Thanks a lot. This is very helpful. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top