Solve Guass Jordan Problem: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulchem
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations using Gaussian elimination and specifically the Gauss-Jordan method. A user expresses frustration with their calculations and seeks help after encountering an arithmetic error during row operations. Another participant identifies the mistake and suggests a clearer approach to redoing the problem, emphasizing the importance of formatting for readability. The conversation also touches on the use of LaTeX for better presentation of mathematical work. The thread concludes with encouragement to redo the problem step-by-step using the suggested formatting for clarity.
paulchem
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Use guass jordan reduction


Hi, sorry for introducing myself. I was just frustrated because I've been trying to do this problem for awhile.

4x+y-3z=11
2x-3y+2z=9
x+y+z=-3



4 1 -3 11
0 -1 0 3
0 3 7 -23

R2+2R3-->R2
4R3+-R1-->R3


3R1+-R3-->R1
4 0 2 56
0 -1 0 3
0 3 7 -23

I'm stuck here.

The calculator gave me

1 0 0 7/18
0 1 0 -3
0 0 1 -7/18

Please tell me where I went wrong thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing I often do with these type of problems is that I redo the work from scratch -- I usually won't make the same mistake both times. (swapping rows around decreases the odds of remaking the mistake too)


That being said, you made an arithmetic error computing R2+2R3-->R2.
 
Last edited:
I think a good idea when you start one of these questions is to first eliminate any coefficients of x which are greater than 1. So in the case of your question, starting with the given system, I would do:

R1' = R1 - 4R3
R2' = R2 - 2R3
 
Hello PaulChem. You know, I'm not trying to be critical, really I'm not, but those numbers look a little "busy", hard to follow. I don't expect you to know now how to make some really nice math format using LaTex which you can learn all about by jumping to the Physics Forum and checking out "Introducing LaTex". But here is what it would look like with a little formatting. Just double click on it and a small window will pop up showing the LaTex commands:

<br /> \left[ <br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br />

Edit: alright single click, whatever. I get confussed.
 
Last edited:
And if you want to draw a partitioned array...

<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> <br /> \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> <br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> <br /> \right)<br /> <br />
 
Hurkyl said:
And if you want to draw a partitioned array...

<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> <br /> \begin{array}{ccc|c}<br /> <br /> 4 &amp; 1 &amp; -3 &amp; 11 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 3 \\<br /> <br /> 0 &amp; 3 &amp; 7 &amp; -23 <br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> <br /> \right)<br /> <br />

Oh that is so much nicer. Mine is crummy.

Edit: Yep, PaulChem, I say do the whole problem again using Hurkly's format, step by step, nice "partitioned arrays", cut and past his commands into your post. With a final line saying: x, y, and z are: :smile:
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top