Solve Inverse Cubed Force: Find A & B in r(θ) for E & L

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the motion of a body under a repulsive inverse cubed force, F = K/r^3, and finding the path r(θ) expressed as 1/r = A cos[β(θ-θ₀)]. Initial attempts included incorporating an inverse square force, which was deemed incorrect. The correct potential energy is V(r) = K/2r^2, leading to the differential equations for dr/dθ and dθ in terms of energy E and angular momentum L. Participants are seeking guidance on how to simplify the equations to facilitate further analysis using trigonometric substitutions. The thread highlights the challenges in deriving constants A and β from the established relationships.
ghostops
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Question: A body of mass m is moving in a repulsive inverse cubed force given by
F = K/r^3 where K > 0​
show the path r(θ) of the body given by
1/r = A cos[β(θ-θο)]
Find the values of constants A and β in terms of E, L.

Work done so far:
we did a similar problem with inverse square so I am attempting to modify that for use with cubes

so far I have
F = K/r^2+K/r^3
V(r) = ∫ F(r)dr
V(r) = K/r + K/2r^2
dr/dθ = r^2/L√[2u(E-L^2/2ur^2-K/r - K/2r^2)]

distributing and moving L
dθ=dr/r^2 1/√[2uE/L^2 - 1/r^2 - uK/L^2r^2 - 2uK/L^2r]^-½
substituting 1/r for ω and dr/r^2 for dω
dθ=dω1/√[2uE/L^2 - ω^2 - uKω^2/L^2 - 2uKω/L^2]^-½
from here our professor wants us to reduce this to dθ=dω/√(a^2+x^2) so we can use trig sub we are running into issues and don't really know how to move forward. any help would be useful.

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question says that the force is inverse cube. In your work, you have two forces, an inverse square, + an inverse cube. Why did you do that?
 
I was trying to apply Newton's theorem of revolving orbits and I believe I just went completely off from where I should have been heading
 
The inverse square term should not be there.
 
ok so without that it becomes

F = K/r^3
V(r) = ∫ F(r)dr
V(r) = K/2r^2
dr/dθ = r^2/L√[2u(E-L^2/2ur^2- K/2r^2)]
distributing and moving L​
dθ=dr/r^2 1/√[2uE/L^2 - 1/r^2 - uK/L^2r^2]^-½
substituting 1/r for ω and dr/r^2 for dω
dθ=dω1/√[2uE/L^2 - ω^2 - uKω^2/L^2]^-½
consolidating
dθ=dω1/√[2uE/L^2 - (1+ uK/L^2)ω^2]^-½
I still do not where to go from here however

again thank you for any help provided
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Thread 'Stacked blocks & pulley system'
I've posted my attempt at a solution but I haven't gone through the whole process of putting together equations 1 -4 yet as I wanted to clarify if I'm on the right path My doubt lies in the formulation of equation 4 - the force equation for the stacked block. Since we don't know the acceleration of the masses and we don't know if mass M is heavy enough to cause m2 to slide, do we leave F_{12x} undetermined and not equate this to \mu_{s} F_{N} ? Are all the equations considering all...
Back
Top