Solve Kepler's Law: Find Satellite's Period

  • Thread starter Thread starter keeholee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler's law Law
keeholee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Kepler's Law help!

Use this equation: T^2 of A / R^3 of A = T^2 of B / R^3 of B

The moon has a period of 27.3 days and has a mean distance of 3.9*10^5 km from the center of the earth. Find the period of an artifical satellite that is 7.5*10^3 km from the center of the earth.

How do i solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Kepler's law states that the period of a satellite squared over its radius cubed is always constant.

Therefore, you can just plug the values into the equation and solve for T^2 of (the period of the artificial satellite).
 


yes i got .075 for the period. but isn't that way too small considering the distance from center of the Earth to artifical satellite is bigger than the mean distance from the center of the Earth to the moon?
 


The distance to the artificial satellite from the Earth is a whole 10^2 smaller, according to the question you posted. The moon is farther away. .075 days for the period however, seems off.
 


oh yea Oo.


welll yea it is really off but is that possible? maybe its in Earth's i have to convert it or something? which i don't know how
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top