Solve Mass and Dist. of Bar Weights: x-m

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmannmf
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A beam of mass 10.0 kg is in static equilibrium, suspended by a rope with a tension of 637 N, while a 40.0 kg mass is attached at one end and an unknown mass m1 is at the other. The beam's length is 3 m, and the torque must be calculated about the left end. The correct distance x from the left end to the rope attachment point is critical for solving the problem, with the center of mass of the beam assumed to be at 1.5 m. Calculations should account for the uniform distribution of mass and the sum of torques equaling zero. Accurate calculations and clear presentation of work are essential for resolving the issue.
mattmannmf
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
A beam of mass mb = 10.0 kg, is suspended from the ceiling by a single rope. It has a mass of m2 = 40.0 kg attached at one end and an unknown mass m1 attached at the other. The beam has a length of L = 3 m, it is in static equilibrium, and it is horizontal, as shown in the figure above. The tension in the rope is T = 637 N.

a) Determine the distance, x, from the left end of the beam to the point where the rope is attached. Note: take the torque about the left end of the beam.

I know that M1 is 15 kg. I keep getting 4 m from the point of rotation but that's wrong. here is the help they told me, but i just don't think it makes sense at all:

HELP: We know the sum of the torques will be zero. Since we are taking the torque about the left end of the beam, there are only three torques we will need to deal with.

HELP: We can assume the beam is uniform in distribution of mass and therefore take the torque of the beam at the center, 1.5 meters. Remember that the torque is the force time the perpendicular distance, i.e. be careful with the distances you choose. The torque is zero about every point, and therefore you can take the torque about another point as a check.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be helpful if you showed your calculations. We have no way of knowing what you did otherwise.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top