Solve Mercury's Perihelion Shift with Euler-Lagrange Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter LoopQG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury
LoopQG
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to calculate S in order to calculate the perihelion shift of Mercury. I have found the Euler Lagrange equation to be:

G^{\nu\beta}(\partial_{\beta}S)(\partial_{\nu}S)-m^{2}=0

Which is a form of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.

Which my professor tells me is correct. I am just not sure on how to start calculating S. I have been given G^{00},G^{11},G^{22},G^{33} Do I just plug those into solve for S? I think I am just confused on how to start I think. Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
space dynamics

I am working out a problem on orbital motion: Thus finding the minimum kinetic energy required for a comet to change the new orbit to a parabola after colliding with another planet of a bigger mass.

My idea is first setting the condition for a parabolic orbit: thus e=1
and using the equation E+Gm/r(1-ro/2r)=0
I am expand these equation further by making a few substitutions can i get help in continuing this? Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top