Solve Newton's Second Law: Find Angle of Elevation w/ 1.86cm Blocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to Newton's Second Law, specifically finding the angle of elevation for a 1.00-m long track with a combined block thickness of 1.86 cm. The original poster expresses confusion about the problem's requirements, particularly the meaning of "thickness" and its relevance to the angle calculation. They suggest that the right end of the track is elevated by 1.86 cm, creating an incline, and consider using trigonometry to find the angle. Other participants question whether the problem is fully stated and emphasize the need for clarity on how Newton's laws apply. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of interpreting the problem and the importance of understanding the relationship between the given parameters.
oceanflavored
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two calibrated elevation blocks have a combined thickness of 1.86 cm. Find the angle of elevation of the 1.00-m long track for this situation.


Homework Equations


F = ma?

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having a LOT of trouble, even beginning to draw the picture for this problem. I think if someone could help me draw the picture, I would be good to go :)
Aaaaand, I'm not exactly sure what the 'thickness' refers to? The weight?

I know that I haven't really provided a good enough attempt at a solution :/ But it's because I am honestly really lost as to where I even begin. Any help at all would be greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a diagram, I'm just guessing that the right end of the track is elevated 1.86 cm above the left end, creating an incline sloping upward at a small angle. Use trig to find the angle, I guess. Is there another part to this problem that requires you to use Newton's law?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Is there another part to this problem that requires you to use Newton's law?

Yes, what does Newton's second law have to do with this? :confused:

Have you missed out part of the question? … it doesn't seem to make sense on it own. :redface:
 
Hmmm...
Well, this is one of our pre-labs question. And the lab is titled: Newton's Second Law of Motion. So I figured it had something to do with Newton's Laws?
Also, why do they include the thickness of the blocks, if it's just a simple trig question? :confused:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »

Similar threads

Newton's second law (My turtle named Newton being accelerated)
Replies
9
Views
2K
Having a hard time learning Newton's 2nd law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Rank forces according to magnitude: Newton's 2nd/3rd laws
Replies
5
Views
7K
Finding an angle with Newton's Second Law
Replies
3
Views
4K
Newton's 2nd law with oscilations
Replies
17
Views
2K
Calculating Angle of Elevation for 1.00m Track with 1.86cm Blocks
Replies
1
Views
2K
Newton's Third Law Problem: Two masses, a rope and a pulley
Replies
21
Views
10K
Newton's Second Law -- Accelerations in a pulley system
Replies
8
Views
4K
Conceptual questions about Newton's Laws....
Replies
15
Views
4K
Show that Newton's Second Law is valid?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top