Solve Parallax Equation: Find Distance to Star in km & ly

  • Thread starter Thread starter radius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallax
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the parallax equation to determine the distance to a star using the formula D=(d/2)/tan(theta/2). Given d as 300 million kilometers and theta as 5*10^-5 degrees, the calculated distance is approximately 343,774,677,078.41 km. The conversion to light years was initially estimated at 27 light years, but it was suggested that this conversion needs to be recalculated for accuracy. Participants confirm that D and d must have the same units, and the correct approach to the conversion is emphasized. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculations in astronomical distance measurements.
radius
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
please can somebody help me with this parallax equation:

D=distance to star
theta=angle
using the rule D=(d/2)/tan(theta/2)
when d = 300*10tothe6
and theta = 5*10tothe-5

what is the distance to the star in km and light years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the problem?

(d is in what units?)
 
d is in km and theta is in degrees.
This is as close as i can get:
for this answer i get a result of:

343774677078406.6587981892079753

So, is this answer the number of km?

what is this answer in exponential form? ie: 34 * 10tothepower13?

1 light year is 9.467*10tothepower12, so in light years i think the distance will be:
27 light years

Please let me know if i am right
 
D and d have the same units. Your value for D in km is correct, but you messed up the conversion to light years. Do it over, more carefully.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top