Solve Physics Homework with Minimum Speed | Q4 Equations | Physics Forums

  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics homework problem related to minimum speed using polar coordinates. Participants analyze the velocity and acceleration equations, emphasizing the importance of derivatives in identifying extrema. One contributor points out a potential error in the original work and suggests a method to verify conclusions using second derivatives. The conversation also touches on the distinction between speed and velocity, clarifying their definitions and physical meanings. Overall, the thread provides insights into the mathematical approach to the problem and the nuances of kinematics.
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See Q4 https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=39736&d=1318081996"


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure whether my direction of thinking is correct.
I have a bad feeling about my work.
Is my work correct?

http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/317084_2287980633629_1072324659_2450377_542887368_n.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there!
Personally, I would have done this slightly differently:
First, recall that in polar coordinates:
<br /> \large<br /> |v| = \sqrt{\dot{r}^2+r^2\dot{\theta}^2}<br />
Differentiating that would yield the result, directly.
Also, since you'll have to find the acceleration anyway, another derivative could also help with establishing the extrema, in other words, whether they are minima or maxima.
I hope that works for you,
Daniel
 
Also, by this method, your efforts seem to contain an error there, so you may need to look into it again, in any case(I get the extremum at t=c).
 
I also get extremum at t=c, but it turns out to be maximum, since dv/dt is increasing for 0<t<c and decreasing for c<t<2c
 
Well, there may be an arithmatical discrepancy there, that one might want to follow;
Let's derive it together:
<br /> \frac{d|v|}{dt} = -\frac{2b}{c^3}(c-t)<br />
By using your approach, if we plug in, a value to the "left" of t=c, say, 0.5c, we would get: -b/c^2
And, by inserting 1.5c(literally, to the "right" of t=c), it merely reduces to: +b/c^2.
If you want to take it a step further, in order to verify your conclusions, one could always use the second derivative, i.e d^2v/dt^2;
Remembering that:
<br /> \Large<br /> if \frac{d^2v}{dt^2}\vert_{t=c} &gt; 0 \Rightarrow \min<br />
In our case, the second derivative, as is easily verifiable, is constant, and equal to 2*b/c^3,clearly, minimal, for all events and purposes.
Was that more useful?
Thanks,
Daniel
 
Thanks a lot!
 
I suddenly think of a question.
Is \frac{d|\vec{s}|}{dt}=\vec{|v|}?
Because they look different. If they are not the same, what is the physical meaning of \frac{d|\vec{s}|}{dt}? Does it related to speed?
 
You're very astute in pointing out a deficiency in the definition we may occasionally give to velocity as it pertains to trajectory.
S-as a curve, or path, would lead to the total course taken by a particle. Differentiating it, leads to the rate of change of it, its curvature, parameters, so forth, overtime, a sort of average 1/k(s), where "k" is the osculation of the journey, rather than the velocity; It's "speed", literally speaking.
By velocity, or dr/dt, we take the discrete, local, momentary rate of change of the path, that we are so desirous of in calculus.
You're very accurate in pointing out the finer nuances of the trade, and kudos for that!
Daniel
 
Back
Top