Solve Physics Problem with Crane Sling Tension Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter real hero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crane Tension
real hero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
crane sling tension...

Here i am stucked with some problems in physics.could you please help me to solve the below problem

0fcf3c1d.jpg



from the photo of the tower crane,if the crane is to lift a concrete slab with dimension of 250mm,3400mm,6000mm calculate the.



1.load in kN that thecrane is carrying

2.tension in each of the verticle cable

3.load acting on the tower of the crane

4.pressure acting on the foundation of the crane

5.moment of force(load moment)acting on the foundation of the crane

6.work done if the concrete is moved over a distance of 50 ft

7.energy that released when the concrete slab fall on to the ground,if the vertical cable failed when the load was at a height of 20 m

8.based on the photo of tower crane explain the advantages of the movable pulley above the load that is being lifted..

for the crane diomension you can use any crane diomension getting from internet...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


[PLAIN][URL]http://i971.photobucket.com/albums/ae192/sajeeshsalim/0fcf3c1d.jpg[/PLAIN][/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top