I Solve Physics Problems: Splitting Algebraic Equations | Step-by-Step Guide

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Dad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around splitting the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution formula to isolate a coefficient (a). The user seeks clarification on rearranging the equation f(v) = 4π(m/2(pi)kbT)3/2v2e(-mv2/2kbT) into the form f(v) = aT-3/2v2e(-mv2/2kbT). Participants confirm that the term T-3/2 can be expressed as 1/T3/2, leading to the conclusion that a = 4π(m/2kb)3/2. The conversation highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation and the simplification of terms, ultimately providing reassurance and guidance to the user.
Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I am having a real senior moment and can't quite get my head around a physics problem.

I need to split an equation into two parts, in turn creating a coefficient and my mind has gone totally blank!

I need to split the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution formula from:

f(v) = 4π(m/2(pi)kbT)3/2v2e(-mv2/2kbT)

formula into the following:

f(v) = aT-3/2v2e(-mv2/2kbT)

where a is a coefficient to be determined.

I understand that I am isolating variables in order to create a coefficient (a) but every time I get going I lead myself down a merry path and end up with something different!

Any help would be gratefully received
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well, the second part of the formula(after ##v^2##) is equal in both forms so we only have to consider ##4\pi(\frac{m}{2\pi K_bT})^{\frac{3}{2}} = aT^{\frac{-3}{2}}##
remember that ##\frac{1}{T^{x}} = T^{-x}## and there you are
 
I am getting an answer but I don't have confidence in my reasoning behind it.

Basically, if 4π(m/(2kbT))3/2=aT-3/2

am I right in thinking that T-3/2 becomes 1/T3/2?

if so, after doing a bit of rearranging magic from here, I get the answer that a=4π(m/2kb)3/2

I just feel like I am getting algebra blindness!

Thanks in advance for your patience!
 
Last edited:
yep, i also want you to notice that it is really immediate to see ##4\pi(\frac{m}{2\pi K_bT})^{3/2} = 4\pi(\frac{m}{2\pi K_b})^{3/2}T^{-3/2} = aT^{-3/2}## so the ##T^{-3/2}## just get canceled out and there's no magic at all :P

so you basically missed a ##\pi##, probably just for distraction, but you're there:
##a = 4\pi(\frac{m}{2\pi K_b})^{3/2}##
now ##4\pi \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}## can be further simplified, give it a try
 
Thanks a lot, and yes, you're right, I missed the π from the denominator.

I know it is obvious to see the cancellation, but I wanted to make certain by expanding and then just cancelling down to be sure.

Your assistance has been really greatly appreciated. I am sure it won't be the last time I am asking but it is great to know that a facility like this exists.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top