Solve Potential & Energy Problems in Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter clairez93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving potential and energy problems related to electrostatics. For the first problem, the potential at the center of a circle with three charges is calculated, with the provided answer being 9 V, although calculations yield a different result, suggesting possible rounding issues. The second problem involves finding the electrostatic energy stored in the electric field of a conducting sphere, with the correct formula identified as kQ² / 2R. Participants express confusion over the application of formulas, particularly regarding the energy required to assemble the charge on the sphere. The conversation hints at the need for integration to accurately calculate the total energy involved in building the charge.
clairez93
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2. The potential at the center of a circle of radius 90 cm with three charges of +1 nC, -2 nC, and +2 nC placed 120 degrees apart on the circumference is:
a) 8.0 V
b) 12
c) 16
d) 9
Answer: d
6. The electrostatic energy stored in the electric field around a conducting sphere of radius R carrying a net charge of Q is:

a)kQ^{2} / 2R
b)kQ^{2} / 4R
c)kQ^{2} / 2R^{2}
d) kQ^{2} / 4R^{3}
Answer: a

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



2) V = \frac{k}{0.9}*10^{-9}*(1-2+2) = 10 V
That obviously doesn't agree with the answer.

6) I was thinking of doing U = qV, and then using kq/r for the potential of a sphere, except then I don't have a point charge to multiply by. If i multiply by q, I just get kq^2 / r, which isn't the right answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, I'm not sure what's going on. My calculations seem to agree with yours. Maybe it's one of those "pick the closest answer" things? (Or maybe whoever made up the question is really bad at rounding)

For the second one, U = qV applies to the case where you're moving a single point charge (q) through an existing potential difference. That's not really what you're dealing with here. However, you could consider assembling this sphere of charge one bit at a time. Roughly speaking, the first bit q takes no energy (because there's no existing potential), the second bit takes U = qV = q\cdot kq/r, the third bit takes U = qV = q\cdot 2kq/r, etc. If you add up all these energy contributions and extrapolate to the total amount required to build up a charge Q, you'll find how much energy is involved in creating the sphere, which is the same amount of energy stored in its electric field (since there's nowhere else for that energy to go).
 
diazona said:
For the first one, I'm not sure what's going on. My calculations seem to agree with yours. Maybe it's one of those "pick the closest answer" things? (Or maybe whoever made up the question is really bad at rounding)

For the second one, U = qV applies to the case where you're moving a single point charge (q) through an existing potential difference. That's not really what you're dealing with here. However, you could consider assembling this sphere of charge one bit at a time. Roughly speaking, the first bit q takes no energy (because there's no existing potential), the second bit takes U = qV = q\cdot kq/r, the third bit takes U = qV = q\cdot 2kq/r, etc. If you add up all these energy contributions and extrapolate to the total amount required to build up a charge Q, you'll find how much energy is involved in creating the sphere, which is the same amount of energy stored in its electric field (since there's nowhere else for that energy to go).

So I'm guessing this will involve an integral of sorts. Would I integrate the little bits of potential energy? So like the integral of V * q?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top