Solve Quadratic Equations: Calculate Equation of Curve

matt_crouch
Messages
157
Reaction score
1
how do you calculate the equation of a quadratic curve. A straight line curve uses
y-y1=m(x-x1) is i an alteration of this line?
cheers
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually there are multiple ways of expressing lines, quadratics etc.

The general form is
y=ax^2+bx+c where a\neq 0
This is efficient because it is translated into the quadratic formula easily.

There is also the vertex form
y=a(x-k)^2+q
This form quickly gives the vertex (k,q) of the parabola.

etc.

To calculate the equation of a quadratic, you need 3 points minimum. If you know it's a parabola then you will also know it can be expressed in the general form y=ax^2+bx+c
If one of the points given to you lie on the parabola, then the point satisfies the quadratic. i.e. you can substitute the x and y value of the point into the general form.
Lets say its (2,3)
Then 3=4a+2b+c which is a linear equation with 3 variables.
Once you do this for all 3 points, you will have 3 equations with 3 variables. Thus, you can solve them simultaneously to find the values of a, b and c.

These values can then be plugged back into the general form to give you your parabola.
 
Those are the formulas for quadratic functions- whose graphs are parabolas with vertical axis. You can have parabolas at any angle to the axes but then they are not the graphs of functions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top