Solve Reversible Expansion of Ideal Gas: q, Work, ΔU

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpringWater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem Heat Thermo
AI Thread Summary
In a reversible expansion of an ideal gas with constant pressure, the user is confused about whether to use Cp or Cv for calculating work and heat. The user initially assumes Cp should be used due to constant pressure but finds the textbook suggests using Cv instead. The discussion highlights the distinction between heat capacities at constant pressure and constant volume, with the user questioning the rationale behind the textbook's guidance. Clarification is sought on whether the change in volume is negligible enough to justify using Cv. Understanding the correct application of these concepts is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
SpringWater
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem provides two paths. P1,V1,T1------->P1,V2,T3 (this is the only one i do not understand) for AN IDEAL GAS reversible expansion

Pressure---constant
Volume---not constant
Temperature---not constant

Calculate the q(rev)=? work(rev)=? and ΔU=?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Because the pressure is constant I assumed that Cp(heat cap@ constant pressure) should be used instead of Cv (heat cap@constant volume)

so...

Work(rev)=∫Cp(T)dT however the book says use ∫Cv(T)dT why is this?

It does not make sense to me because the pressure is constant and the volume changes so why use Cv over Cp Cp=5/2*R Cv=3/2R or is the book stating that the change in volume is so small that we can still use Cv(T).

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which book is that?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top