Solve Series Difficulty: \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k} & \sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}x^{k}

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chewy0087
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Series
Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that

\sum^{n}_{k=0} x^{k}= \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}

Obtain a similar result for ;

\sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k}
\sum^{n}_{k=1} k^{2}x^{k}

The Attempt at a Solution



Hey, well basically my trouble with this question stems from the manipulation of the limits and the effects that it has on the series itself;

For the first one, I differentiated giving me;

\sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1}= \frac{x^{n+1}-x^{n}(n+1)+1}{(1-x)^{2}}

Obviously when k<0 it doesn't hold as it would be 0, so I changed it to 1 from 0, and I can then reduce the lower index to 0 to make it into a better form.

However I'm just confused as to how to manipulate the index, and as to whether it would have any effect on the initial RHS equation. I don't seem to be getting the right answer in the way I've done above.

I have looked this up but no-where seems to be very helpful about it...

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Manipulating the index in a sum is as easy as changing variables. If k starts at k=1, then s=k-1 starts at 0. So

<br /> \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1} = \sum_{s=0}^{n-1} (s+1) x^s.<br />
 
I have a feeling that it's something to do with discarding the k=0 and so changing to to k=1, and then changing the index back to 0 and doing the same? But that feels like such a cop-out.
 
fzero said:
Manipulating the index in a sum is as easy as changing variables. If k starts at k=1, then s=k-1 starts at 0. So

<br /> \sum^{n}_{k=1} kx^{k-1} = \sum_{s=0}^{n-1} (s+1) x^s.<br />

I feel so stupid, I wasn't reducing the upper limit >.<.

Thanks bud
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top