Solve this Hamiltonian System in Several Ways

ResiRadloff
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let us denote by ## \textbf{z} = (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 ## the Cartesian coordinates of a point in the plane.

1. Given the Hamiltonian ## H(\textbf{z}) = \frac{|\textbf{z}|^2}{2} ##, write down the corresponding canonical Hamiltonian system for ##\textbf{z}(t)##.

2. Write down the analytical solution of this system.

In the following, assume that the system reads ##\frac{d}{dt}\textbf{z} = \textbf{F}((\textbf{z}(t)))## where ## \textbf{F} = (F_x,F_y) ##, and let ##t^n = n\Delta t## where ##\Delta t > 0## is the time step size. Also let ## \textbf{z}^n = \textbf{z}(t^n) ##.

3. Solve the Hamiltonian system numerically by using the following numerical methods. For each of them write down the scheme, plot your result vs. the analytical result, and plot energy (= Hamiltonian) and ##L^2 ##-error of the scheme. Start with a random point ##(x_0,y_0) \in [0,1]^2 ## at ## t = 0 ## and evolve ## \textbf{x}(t) ## forward in time. You may use ##\Omega = 2, \Delta t = 0.03 ##, and do 500 time steps.

(a) The explicit Euler method: ##\textbf{z}^{n+1} = \textbf{z}^n + \Delta t \textbf{F}(\textbf{z}^n) ; \textbf{z}^0 = \textbf{z}(t=0) ##

[...]
Relevant Equations
--
Good evening,
unfortunately I can't get to the solution of my task

I wrote for the system:

## \frac{dz}{dt} = \nabla_p H ; \\
\frac{dp}{dt} = - \nabla_z H ##

Then the solution would be (as ## \nabla_p H = 0) ##:

## \frac{dz}{dt} = 0 \Rightarrow z = const. ## and ## p = zt + p_0 ##.

But that can't be as now finding a numerical solution doesn't make sense?.🙁

I would be really happy if someone yould help me?

Thanks a lot
Resi

Danke schonmal und viele Grüße
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you not looking at \begin{split}<br /> \frac{dx}{dt} &amp;= \frac{\partial H}{\partial y} \\<br /> \frac{dy}{dt} &amp;= -\frac{\partial H}{\partial x}\end{split} That is how I would interpret "hamiltonian System" if given a "hamilonian" which is a function of exactly two variables.
 
Okay, thanks, yeah that makes more sense.

Does anyone know how to calculate the Energy-error and what is meant by ##L^2## error?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top