Solve Trigonometric Problem for Dynamics: 4th Hint Equation

manongistong
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This problem is same as the problem on this link https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/trigonometric-problem.76696/ .

I would like to ask the number 4 hint which is "4) We therefore have, for example the equality: " the equations can't be seen on my pc as it will only outputs this
\vec{v}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}=r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\to{v}_{BC}\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}}=r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\to{v}_{BC}=\frac{r_{AC}\omega_{AC}}{\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_ .

The others variables are working okay aside from the said variables/equation.

This is one of the problems I need to solve for passing dynamics. Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$${\vec{v}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}=r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\ \to\ \\ {v}_{BC}\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}}=
r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\ \to\ \\ {v}_{BC}=\frac{r_{AC}\;\omega_{AC}} {\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC} }.$$
 
BvU said:
$${\vec{v}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}=r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\ \to\ \\ {v}_{BC}\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC}}=
r_{AC}\omega_{AC}\ \to\ \\ {v}_{BC}=\frac{r_{AC}\;\omega_{AC}} {\hat{r}_{BC}\cdot\hat{n}_{AC} }.$$

THANK YOU SIR!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top