Solve Unresolved Past Paper Question: Physics 11/11

  • Thread starter Thread starter FunkyDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
FunkyDwarf
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Past paper question - please help, still unresolved! (11/11)

Hey guys

Im studyin for my physics end of year exam (only first year so its prob easy peasy for you guys) but unfortunately i have no answer key as yet so i don't know if what I am doing is right. I get a plausable answer but i just wanted to be sure incase i never get the answers from lecturers (im badgering em heaps don't worry)

Ok this might take a while to set out in latex thing but ill give it a go

The question is about power factor of a parallel LCR ciruit but in a nutshell i need to find C such that the imaginary part of the complex impedance vanishes (ie angle is zero)

Were given that
L= 5 \\<br /> R = 4 and were doing this at mains freq of \omega = 50Hz

Unfortunately i can't upload the image right now but all you need to know is that this parallel circuit has 2 arms, one just has the capacitor the other the resistor and inductor in series.

So, working out impedances:
Z = \frac{1}{(R+\omega Li)} - \omega Ci Now I've always used minus i for the capacitor part because of the angle difference in the phasor, i assume i do that here.

Next i try to get the imaginary parts off the bottom.
\frac{1}{(R+ \omega Li)} * \frac{(R- \omega Li)}{(R-\omega Li)} = \frac{R- \omega Li}{((R^2)+(\omega L)^2)}

Then putting it back in and making it one big happy fraction
\frac{(R-\omega Li - (\omega Ci)(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}{(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}<br /> <br /> = \frac{(R-\omega Li - \omega CR^2 i - \omega ^3 L^2Ci)}{(R^2 +(\omega L)^2)}<br />
Now just taking the imaginary bit and equating to zero (getting rid of denominator for obvious reasons)
<br /> (-\omega L-\omega CR^2-(\omega )^3 L^2C = 0<br /> Then just shoving in those numbers and ignoring the minus sign (which has me rather worried) i get C = 7.9 x 10^-5 farad.

Hope this makes sense and I am right!

Cheers for help (please don't flame my stupidity if i made a stupid mistake, first time with latex too)
-G
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tag closes with [ / tex] (without the spaces of course)<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
yah just fixing that now cheers :D tryin to get omega to work too :S

hmm some of the changes arent saving. anyway
 
Last edited:
It's \omega and the same for the other symbols and functions.

Daniel.
 
yah its not saving the changesEDIT... ah there we go
 
Ok i found out what's wrong, its the fact that i used -iwC instead of +iwC, which screws it all up. However i always thought that due to phasors and phase differences etc your supposed to use the minus. Anyone?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top