Solve Wheatstone Bridge Circuit: Voltage B-D

  • Thread starter Thread starter rave7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a Wheatstone bridge circuit to find the voltage between points B and D. Participants note that the circuit contains two sets of resistors, but there is disagreement on the total resistance calculation, with one user suggesting a value of 102.5 ohms. The use of Kirchhoff's rules is recommended as an effective method for analyzing the circuit, especially since the participants have covered KCL, KVL, Thevenin's theorem, and superposition in their studies. Current division is also mentioned as a potential approach, but clarity on the circuit's configuration is emphasized. Overall, the discussion centers on identifying the correct analysis method for the Wheatstone bridge circuit.
rave7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The circuit in the drawing in known as a Wheatstone bridge circuit. Find the voltage between points B and D. The circuit drawing is inside the attachment.

How should i approach this circuit? i can only conclude that there 2 are sets of parallel resistors. 60ohm being the odd one left. so total resistance i found = 102.5ohm

I use i = V/R to get my total current. which is 0.195A. what should i do from here. use current divider?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rave7,

rave7 said:
The circuit in the drawing in known as a Wheatstone bridge circuit. Find the voltage between points B and D. The circuit drawing is inside the attachment.

How should i approach this circuit? i can only conclude that there 2 are sets of parallel resistors. 60ohm being the odd one left. so total resistance i found = 102.5ohm

I use i = V/R to get my total current. which is 0.195A. what should i do from here. use current divider?

None of these resistors are in parallel or series with each other, so I don't believe your total resistance is correct.

As far as what approach to use, it depends on what kind of circuit analysis approaches they have taught you or are going to teach you in your class. You can use the Kirchoff's rules approach to solve this problem (with a bit of fun algebra) and I think most first year physics classes teach Kirchoff. Is your class only covering equivalent resistances and Kirchoff's rules as a way of analyzing cirvuits?
 
Yes, so far we have only cover KCL, KVL, thevenin's theorem and superposition.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top