Solve Wheatstone Bridge Circuit: Voltage B-D

  • Thread starter Thread starter rave7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a Wheatstone bridge circuit to find the voltage between points B and D. Participants note that the circuit contains two sets of resistors, but there is disagreement on the total resistance calculation, with one user suggesting a value of 102.5 ohms. The use of Kirchhoff's rules is recommended as an effective method for analyzing the circuit, especially since the participants have covered KCL, KVL, Thevenin's theorem, and superposition in their studies. Current division is also mentioned as a potential approach, but clarity on the circuit's configuration is emphasized. Overall, the discussion centers on identifying the correct analysis method for the Wheatstone bridge circuit.
rave7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The circuit in the drawing in known as a Wheatstone bridge circuit. Find the voltage between points B and D. The circuit drawing is inside the attachment.

How should i approach this circuit? i can only conclude that there 2 are sets of parallel resistors. 60ohm being the odd one left. so total resistance i found = 102.5ohm

I use i = V/R to get my total current. which is 0.195A. what should i do from here. use current divider?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rave7,

rave7 said:
The circuit in the drawing in known as a Wheatstone bridge circuit. Find the voltage between points B and D. The circuit drawing is inside the attachment.

How should i approach this circuit? i can only conclude that there 2 are sets of parallel resistors. 60ohm being the odd one left. so total resistance i found = 102.5ohm

I use i = V/R to get my total current. which is 0.195A. what should i do from here. use current divider?

None of these resistors are in parallel or series with each other, so I don't believe your total resistance is correct.

As far as what approach to use, it depends on what kind of circuit analysis approaches they have taught you or are going to teach you in your class. You can use the Kirchoff's rules approach to solve this problem (with a bit of fun algebra) and I think most first year physics classes teach Kirchoff. Is your class only covering equivalent resistances and Kirchoff's rules as a way of analyzing cirvuits?
 
Yes, so far we have only cover KCL, KVL, thevenin's theorem and superposition.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top