Solve x: Algebraically | x^3*e^(-a/x)=b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation x^3 e^(-a/x) = b algebraically, one should first isolate the logarithmic and non-logarithmic terms. The Lambert W function is recommended for such equations, as it can simplify expressions of the form f(x)e^f(x) = C. By rearranging the equation into this form, one can apply the Lambert W function to both sides, leading to a solution for x. The final solution derived is x = a/(3W(ab^(-1/3)/3)). The discussion emphasizes the utility of the Lambert W function in solving complex algebraic equations.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
How would you solve for x algebraically?

x^3 e^{\frac{-a}{x}} = b

where a and b are some constants.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this homework? If so, I can move it.

Start by isolating the logarithmic terms and the non-log terms. What can you do to get the x^3 away from the e^ term? Once you do that, what can you do to both sides of the equation to get rid of the e^?
 
The Lambert W function is the first thing to try when you have something that looks like that. It has the property that W(x e^x) = x. So try to rearrange that into the form f(x) e^f(x) = C for some constant C, and then apply W to both sides to get f(x)=W(C).
 
berkeman said:
Is this homework? If so, I can move it.

Start by isolating the logarithmic terms and the non-log terms. What can you do to get the x^3 away from the e^ term? Once you do that, what can you do to both sides of the equation to get rid of the e^?
I don't think that's going to help. If you do that, then you are just trapping x inside the natural log function instead of the exponential function.
 
StatusX said:
The Lambert W function is the first thing to try when you have something that looks like that. It has the property that W(x e^x) = x. So try to rearrange that into the form f(x) e^f(x) = C for some constant C, and then apply W to both sides to get f(x)=W(C).
Wow! That's news to me. I searched the lambert W function on Wikipedia and I have to say it is pretty interesting. Let me see what I can do...
 
Got it!. I am 99% sure that the answer is:
x = \frac{a}{3W(\frac{ab^{-1/3}}{3})}.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top