Solved: Paraxial Wave Equation - Constant Phase Surfaces

Confundo
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
paraxial wave equation - Solved

Homework Statement



When a laser beam traveling is traveling in one direction, we can make the paraxial approximation.

Question: Find an expression for the surfaces with constant phase in the beam.

Homework Equations



From a previous part of the question, I had to work out the paraxial wave equation
which
\nabla^2_{x,y}G - 2ik\frac{\delta G}{\delta z}
and confirm that the below was a solution
G(r, \omega) =\frac{1}{s^2(z)}exp[-\frac{x^2+y^2}{s^2(z)}]
where s^2(z) = w_0^2 - \frac{2iz}{k}

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have to find an equation of the form.

G = Re^{i\phi}
phase = \phi
where R = radius of curvature

The complex parts are confusing, the solution/equation isn't spherical so I'm a bit stuck on where to start.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I considered the more general algebraic problem of finding the expression for the constant phase of

<br /> G=\frac{1}{a-ib}\exp\left(-\frac{c}{a-ib}\right)<br />

I first do the conjugate multiplication thing, so that I'm dealing with sums of real and imaginary parts.

<br /> G=\left(\frac{a}{a^2+b^2}+i\frac{b}{a^2+b^2}\right)\exp\left(-\frac{ca}{a^2+b^2}-i\frac{cb}{a^2+b^2}\right)<br />

Then I factorize, with my eye on the prize.

<br /> G=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}\exp\left(i\arctan\frac{b}{a}\right)\exp\left(-\frac{ca}{a^2+b^2}\right)\exp\left(-i\frac{cb}{a^2+b^2}\right)<br />

Finally, I collect factors so that I have the standard polar form.

<br /> G=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}\exp\left(-\frac{ca}{a^2+b^2}\right)\exp\left(i\left(\arctan\frac{b}{a}-\frac{cb}{a^2+b^2}\right)\right)<br />

So, a constant phase would require the transcendental equation to be satisfied.

<br /> \arctan\frac{b}{a}-\frac{cb}{a^2+b^2}=\textrm{constant}<br />

Perhaps the paraxial approximation allows the \arctan to be approximated so that the equation becomes solvable ...
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Very clever piece of factorising there :). The lecturer said not to be concerned with a long equation.
 
I wouldn't call that result "a long equation" (even though it is unsolvable). Are you looking for something simpler?
 
Shouldn't of said long without a reference if I'm studying physics really :). The paraxial approximation allows the small angle approximation to be used.
 
Confundo said:
The paraxial approximation allows the small angle approximation to be used.
I believe you mean
The paraxial approximation requires the small angle approximation to be used.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top