Solved: Width of Slit with Monochromatic Light 550nm is 0.055mm

  • Thread starter Thread starter somecelxis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slit Width
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the width of a slit using monochromatic light of wavelength 550nm and a converging lens with a focal length of 50cm. The user initially applied the formula x = λD/a but misinterpreted the variable x, assuming it represented the distance between the first minima rather than the distance from the central maximum to the first minima. Clarification is sought on whether the formula is intended for the distance between two first-order minima or from the central maximum to one of the minima. The correct interpretation leads to the conclusion that the width of the slit is 0.055mm. This highlights the importance of accurately defining variables in diffraction problems.
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Monochromatic light of wavelength 550nm is used to illuminate normally a narrow slit. A converging lens of focal length 50cm is used to focus the diffraction pattern onto a screen. If the separation between the first minima is 10.0mm What is the width of the slit. The ans is 0.055mm.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


by using formula x= λD/ a ,
i have 10x10^-3 = (550x10^-9) x ( 50x10^-2) / (a) ,
i get my a = 0.0275mm ... What's wrong with my working?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
somecelxis said:
by using formula x= λD/ a ...

Is this formula meant to give the distance between the two first-order minima or is it meant to give the distance between the central maximum and one of the first-order minima?
 
I guess the op means the distance between two first min is x ?
 
In the working above I assume the x is distance between two first minimum... Anything wrong with it?
 
x is the distance of any of the first minima from the central maximum.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top