Solvent effect in ambident nucleophiles

AI Thread Summary
In ambident nucleophiles, polar aprotic solvents allow the more electronegative atom to attack the substrate, promoting carbocation formation and potentially leading to an SN1 reaction. However, these solvents typically favor SN2 mechanisms due to their ability to stabilize nucleophiles. The discussion emphasizes that while polar aprotic solvents are associated with SN2 reactions, SN1 can still occur, especially if the reaction conditions favor carbocation stability. The determination of the major product depends on experimental outcomes, as all possible reactions can happen simultaneously. Ultimately, the reaction mechanism is influenced by various factors, including the nature of the nucleophile, substrate, and solvent.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18
If nucleophile is ambident and solvent is polar aprotic, more electronegative atom is free to attack the substrate.
Since more electronegative atom is a hard base, it forms a stronger bond with hard acids like carbocation. This promotes formation of carbocation by substrate. Hence, SN1 reaction should take place

But, polar aprotic solvent favours SN2 reaction.

So which mechanism does the reaction follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give the exact nucleophile, substrate, solvent and reaction conditions involved? If it is a technical question, give an example. It would help in making the debate more easier to follow.
 
Example, if CN- was the nucleophile, N is more electronegative. If I used polar protic solvent, Hydrogen bonding will happen with N. So N is hindered and can't act as a good nucleophile.

If the solvent was aprotic, there is nothing to stop N.

Now, (in polar aprotic solvent) N is a hard base and it promotes formation of carbocation (hard base likes hard acids). Then N will attack the carbocation. If carbocation forms, the reaction is SN1. But polar aprotic solvents are generally used for sn2 right?
 
The thing with organic chemistry is this uncertainty. Here is what I know: Every possible reaction happens in every possible case.

What is necessary is which reaction gives the major product. In your case, SN1 may give the major product, but we cannot decide unless the experiment is already performed.

Titan97 said:
But polar aprotic solvents are generally used for sn2 right?

Yes they are. But that doesn't mean other reactions cannot occur. As I said, every possible reaction occurs, but the amount formed could be indeed very tiny. If you are familiar with chemical kinetics, you must know the collision theory of reactions. An organic reaction takes place because of collision between molecules. The molecules can be made to collide anyway possible. And because of the different factors involved (orientation, place of collision, KE of participants,etc), all possible products will form. The major product will be decided based on how majority of the collisions occur.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top