Solving 1-D Motion Problem: Collision & Speed Calculation for Two Trains

  • Thread starter Thread starter hb1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
Two trains, a red one traveling at 71.8 km/h and a green one at 143.6 km/h, are on a collision course, initially 950.9 m apart, and both apply brakes that decelerate them at 1.017 m/s². The initial analysis confirmed a collision would occur. The second part of the problem involves calculating the speed of each train at impact, but the calculations led to imaginary numbers, indicating a potential error. Upon reevaluation, it was found that the red train stops before the collision, confirming that the trains do not collide as initially thought. The problem's setup was acknowledged as creative but frustrating for those solving it.
hb1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(a) A red train traveling at 71.8 km/h and a green train traveling at 143.6 km/h are headed toward one another along a straight, level track. When they are 950.9 m apart, each engineer sees the other's train and applies the brakes. The brakes decelerate each train at the rate of 1.017 m/s2. Is there a collision?

I got the answer: yes.

Second part of the problem (where I'm stumped):

(b) If so, what is the speed of each train at impact?

For simplicity's sake, I tried adding the distances each train would travel if it were heading in the positive x direction (positive velocity, negative acceleration) to get 950.9 m. In other words, I wrote:

V-naught-R * t + 1/2 * a * t^2 + V-naught-G * t + 1/2 * a * t^2 = 950.9

Then I tried to solve the quadratic equation for t, but I get imaginary numbers.. so there must be something wrong with my equation. HELP!

Edit: Sorry, this should probably be in the high school forum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your math again, but if you keep getting imaginary numbers, that would make sense only if the trains don't actually collide, so you should check your work in the first part.
 
No, my dad figured it out. The reason I was getting imaginary numbers is because the red train is already stopped when the collision occurs. Whoever set the problem up is creative. But I'm not amused.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top