Solving 1st order differential equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a first-order nonlinear differential equation related to the motion of a ball thrown upwards, where the acceleration is defined in terms of velocity, gravitational acceleration, and a constant related to drag. Participants are tasked with determining the time variable in relation to other parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore methods for isolating variables and integrating the equation. Some express confusion regarding the nonlinear nature of the equation and its implications for finding a solution. Others inquire about the relationship between velocity and time and seek clarification on the integration process.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of attempts to clarify the integration process and the nature of the differential equation. Some participants provide insights into the separability of the equation and suggest methods for integration, while others express uncertainty about the notation and the steps involved. No consensus has been reached, but productive questions and guidance have been shared.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the nonlinear equation and the need for a deeper understanding of integration techniques. There are mentions of specific constants and initial conditions that are relevant to the problem but not fully resolved in the discussion.

Kawakaze
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball is thrown upwards, its acceleration is given below.

Determine the time t in terms of v, b, g and v_0 (v_0 is initial speed of the ball) -

dv/dt = -(g/b^2)(v^2 + b^2)

in terms of v, b, g and v_0 (v_0 is initial speed of the ball)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Solving a differential equation shouldn't be so hard, but I don't know where to get t from and also what to do with all the variables.

g = a constant (acc. due to gravity)
b = (mg)(0.2D^2)
v = velocity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
isolate dt and integrate over t i believe.
 
I thought that in solving this I should get an expression like v(t) = some expression containing only constants and t.

Can you point me to any worked examples of similar questions? I also punched this into wolphram alpha and got a reasonable looking answer, I just have no idea where it came from
 
Aah, sorry it looks a bit like your problem is nonlinear cause of the v^2 term. Maybe you can use som calculus of variations or nummerical methods. the differential operator representing the equation is
[itex]\hat{N}v = \dfrac{dv}{dt} +\dfrac{g}{b^2}(v^2+b^2)\\<br /> \text{equation:}\, \hat{N}(v) = 0[/itex]
The operator is nonlinear cause:
[itex]\hat{N}(c_1f + c_2g) \neq c_1\hat{N}f+c_2\hat{N}g[/itex]
 
Thanks for the reply, but I don't understand it, I think it is above the level I am doing. Can you make it simpler please?

I think I need to get v over to the LHS before integrating, is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Hmm, yeah I am just not that familiar with nonlinear equations, but i think it makes sense to get the v over. But a general solution is:
[itex]-b\tan(\dfrac{g(t+c_1)}{b})[/itex]
 
This is very similar to the standard solution given by wolphram alpha, but there is a difference.

v(t) = b.tan((b^2c_1-gt)/b))

Can you please explain what the difference is? I know velocity is going to be > 0 I know there is normally a choice of standard integrals depending on your range of values. Can you please post a link to where you took this from?
 
I took this form maple 15 with dsolve command.
The method for solving is to collect the t dependence on one side and the dv/dt on the other, as it is and integrating both sides.
Your eq is in quadrature format so see this and search the net maybe: http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=odeadvisor/quadrature
And the difference is maybe caused by a typo somewhere? I just typed in the eq from this forum
 
Another problem i can see is that you asked for the time t, that is determined by integrating over t with dt isolated
And that is my intrepetation of your question.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
With first order differential equations the difference between linear and non-linear equations is not that important. What is important is that this equation is "separable". You can write it
[tex]\frac{dv}{v^2+ b^2}= -\frac{g}{b^2}dt[/tex]

integrating,
[tex]\frac{1}{b^2}arctan(v/b)= -\frac{g}{b^2}t+ C[/tex]
for some constant C. Taking t= 0, [itex]v= v_0[/itex] so
[tex]\frac{1}{b^2}arctan(v_0/b)= C[/tex]

Since the problem says "Determine the time", solve the equation
[tex]\frac{1}{b^2}(arctan(v/b)- arctan(v_0/b))= -\frac{g}{b^2}t[/tex]
for t, which is very simple- multply both sides by [itex]-b^2/g[/itex].
 
  • #11
Thanks, this post helped a lot.

Just to be sure, when you integrated the RHS. The t came from the integration of -g/b^2 as two numbers, and not from the dt on the right? I think this is correct as if I differentiated -(g/b^2)t i would get -(g/b^2)

I get confused with the notation dy/dx, as I am constantly told it is one symbol, it is not to be treated as dy over dx. Then I see in some cases it can be moved around, but apparently only if doing so enables you to eliminate it later.

The expression on the LHS is not so tough now I see it before me, the integral of dv must be 1, leaving 1/(v^2 + b^2) which is there is a standard integral for.

This leaves me wondering only why there is no constant of integration on the LHS.

I also don't follow this bit

HallsofIvy said:
[tex]\frac{1}{b^2}(arctan(v/b)- arctan(v_0/b))= -\frac{g}{b^2}t[/tex]

I got instead

[tex]\frac{1}{b}(arctan(v/b)- arctan(v_0/b))= -\frac{g}{b^2}t[/tex]

Please let me know if this is the correct way of seeing it! :)

The last part of the question is

By writing a = v dv/dx, solve the resulting differential equation
and determine the height above the point of projection at time t
in terms of v, b, g and v0.

I do not understand the notation here. They ask for the position, so I assume this is the second derivative of the acceleration expression, or the derivative of the velocity expression. Why is it multiplied by v?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Kawakaze, you're right, that should be 1/b in front of the left side of the equation (check a table of integrals to confirm). Just a small error by HoI, like we all do time to time https://www.physicsforums.com/Nexus/editor/smilie.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Thanks for confirming that, I know I am sure making use of my little mistake quota this week :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K