Solving (2.5 + 2x) / (2.0 - x) = 2.50 Equation in Grade 12 Chem Course

  • Thread starter Thread starter mister_mister3
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation (2.5 + 2x) / (2.0 - x) = 2.50, which is relevant for equilibrium problems in a grade 12 chemistry course. To solve it, the first step is to eliminate the fraction by multiplying both sides by (2.0 - x), leading to the simplified equation 2.5 + 2x = 5.0 - 2.5x. The next steps involve isolating x by rearranging terms, resulting in 4.5x = 2.5. Finally, dividing both sides by 4.5 gives x = 0.56, confirming the solution. The explanation clarifies the calculation process for those struggling with similar math problems.
mister_mister3
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I apologize, but I don't really know what this type of math qualifies as, so it's in general math. Anyhow, it's math that's being used for equilibrium problems in a grade 12 chem course, but my math is VERY rusty...

(2.5 + 2x) / (2.0 - x) = 2.50

and X = 0.56 (sorry, I wasn't sure how to use latex)

My question is this - how do you do the actual calculations, step by step? I'm not even sure what to call this problem to search for it on the internet. I need to know how to manipulate these though, so I may as well become familiar with them.

Any help or links to good sites would be greatly appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(2.5 + 2x) / (2.0 - x) = 2.50

The first thing you do is simplify the equation by getting rid of the fraction: multiply both sides by (2.0- x) (As long as you do the same (legal) thing on both sides of the equation you will get an "equivalent equation"- one that is true if and only if the first is). Multiplying the left side by (2.0-x) just cancels the denominator of the fraction and you get 2.5+ 2x= 2.5(2.0-x) so 2.5+ 2x= 5.0- 2.5x.

Now get x alone on one side. To get x alone on the left side only, I need to get rid of that "2.5" added on the left side and I need to get rid of that 2.5x subtracted on the right. The "opposite" of adding 2.5 is subtracting 2.5 so "subtract 2.5 from both sides: Of course 2.5- 2.5= 0 so 2.5+ 2x- 2.5= 2x: we get just 2x on the left. On the right we have 5.0- 2.5x- 2.5= 2.5- 2.5x. Now our equation reads 2x= 2.5- 2.5x.
The "opposite" of subtracting 2.5x is adding 2.5x so we add 2.5x to both sides:
2x+ 2.5x= 2.5- 2.5x+ 2.5x which is just 4.5x= 2.5.
Now the only reason x is not alone on the left is because it is multiplied by 4.5. The "opposite" of multiplying by 4.5 is dividing by 4.5 so divide both sides by 4.5:
(4.5x)/4.5= 2.5/4.5 or x= 0.555... (Since you numbers involved 2 significant figures, you were round to 0.56).
 
math

Thanks a lot for the help, everything's clear now!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top