Solving 3 Equations for w in Matrix Form

  • Thread starter Thread starter andybham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Matrix
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming three equations involving variables a, b, c, and constants d and e into a matrix form. The equations can be expressed as w*u = T*u, where u is the vector {a, b, c} and T is a specified matrix. Participants explore the possibility of incorporating d and e into the matrix equation without treating them as typos. A proposed matrix T is presented, and the unknowns in the equations are clarified. Ultimately, the equations can be reformulated into a matrix equation that includes the constants d and e.
andybham
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to put these three equations into a matrix equation

w*a = b -2a + e
w*b = c -2b + a
w*c = d -2c + b

of the style w*u = T*u where u is a vector, u = {a, b, c} and T is a matrix. w is just a number.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are d and e? If they are really different and not typos, then you will need T*u+v=w*u, where v is the vector (e,0,d) and ------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
T=
-2 1 0
1 -2 1
0 1 -2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
no they are not typos, could I not use

T = -2 1 e/c
1 -2 1
d/a 1 -2

or is that just stupid?
 
andybham said:
Is it possible to put these three equations into a matrix equation

w*a = b -2a + e
w*b = c -2b + a
w*c = d -2c + b

of the style w*u = T*u where u is a vector, u = {a, b, c} and T is a matrix. w is just a number.

What exactly are the unknowns in your equations? a, b, c? If so, then

(2 + w)a - b = e
-a + (2 + w)b - c = 0
-b + (2 + w)c = d ,

which can be written as
\left(\begin{array}{ccc}2+w & -1 & 0\\-1 & 2+w & -1\\0 & -1 & 2+w\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{ccc}a \\b\\c\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}e \\0\\d\end{array}\right).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top