Solving a 20-Year Puzzle: A Sports Car Enthusiast's Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a sports car enthusiast trying to solve a physics problem involving a hubcap that acts as both a convex and concave mirror. The enthusiast sees his face reflected at different distances when viewing each side of the hubcap, specifically 34.0 cm and 9.4 cm behind the hubcap. The key equations provided are related to the lens/mirror formula and magnification. The challenge lies in determining the distance of his face from the hubcap and identifying which image corresponds to which type of mirror. The problem highlights confusion over the correct application of physics principles, particularly regarding mirror types and image distances.
undrcvrbro
Messages
131
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A dedicated sports car enthusiast polishes the inside and outside surfaces of a hubcap that is a section of a sphere. When he looks into one side of the hubcap, he sees an image of his face 34.0 cm in back of the hubcap. He then turns the hubcap over, keeping it the same distance from his face. He now sees an image of his face 9.4 cm in back of the hubcap.

How far is his face from the hubcap?

Homework Equations


(1/f) = (1/p)+(1/q)
m= -q/p

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I recognize that there is some sort of theoretical way of solving this, but really...im drawing a blank. My AP physics teacher is a little goofy, and when someone asked him for help on the same problem today we(his students) realized that the answer to the problem he had written down for 20 years was incorrect. Please, anyone...I need your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one is a convex mirror, the other side is concave. Given the data, can we tell which image is for which type? The dist of the source is the same in both cases. Is there anything else common for both?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top