Solving a 2D Elastic Collision Problem with Two Unknowns

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a 2D elastic collision problem involving two particles of different masses, where one is initially at rest. The key equations used include conservation of momentum in both x and y directions, as well as conservation of kinetic energy. The challenge lies in determining the final velocities and angle of the particles after the collision, particularly when the angle exceeds 30°, which raises concerns about the validity of the problem. Participants suggest isolating variables from the momentum equations and substituting them into the energy equation to derive a solvable quadratic equation. The conversation also touches on the implications of different angles and the effects of collision dynamics, such as comparing it to a table tennis scenario.
Legit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a particle of mass 2M have an initial velocity of v0i (the i merely indicating it is traveling on the x axis) and undergo an elastic glancing collision with a particle of mass M initially at rest. After the collision, the M particle moves off at an angle of 45° above the + x-axis.

1. What is the speed of the M particle after the collision?

2. What is the velocity (magnitude and direction) of the mass 2M particle after the collision?

m1 = 2M
m2 = M
v1i = v0i
θ2 = 45°

Homework Equations



pix = pfx (momentum conservation in the x direction)
m1v1i = m1v1fcosθ1 + m2v2fcosθ2

piy = pfy (momentum conservation in the y direction)
0 = m1v1fsinθ1 + m2v2fsinθ2

Ki = Kf (conservation of kinetic energy)
m1v1i2 = m1v1f2 + m2v2f2

The Attempt at a Solution



It appears to be a 3 equations 3 unknowns problem (the unknowns being v2f, v1f, and θ1, which are the final velocities of the masses and the angle of mass 2M). I tried adding the two momentum equations to eliminate θ1 and get a new equation to use with the energy equation, that way I would have two equations and two unknowns. But I ended up finding a value for v1f to be -1.41v0i, meaning the ball of larger mass collided with the ball of half-mass, then started going in the opposite direction with a larger velocity, which makes no sense... Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is wrong. The angle must be 30° or smaller.
If you solve the problem symbolically assuming an angle θ, you get a quadratic equation with the discriminant non-negative when cosθ≥√3/2.

ehild
 
So are you saying my professor wrote the problem wrong? That the problem is unsolvable if the angle is greater than 30°? I don't see why the angle must be 30° or lower...

Thanks for the reply by the way. :smile:
 
Isolate v2fsin(θ2) and v2fcos(θ2) from the equations for momentum and substitute into the energy equation. Try to solve for v1 in terms of θ.

ehild
 
I don't understand. I need to isolate v2fsinθ2 and v2fcosθ2 in EACH momentum equation, then substitute into the energy equation? Am I isolating just v2f or do I include the trig functions in my isolation? And how am I supposed to substitute? Do I substitute the result from isolating v2fsinθ2 and v2fcosθ2 separately, giving me two different energy equations?
 
Denote the components of the velocity of the smaller mass after the collision by v2x and v2y.
The momentum equations:

2Mv0=2Mv1f cos(θ)+Mv2x
0=2Mv1f sin(θ)+Mv2y
The energy equation:
2Mv02=2Mv1f2+M(v2x2+v2y2)

Isolating v2x and v2y from the first two equations:

v2x=2v0-2v1fcos(θ)
v2y=-2v1fsin(θ).

Substituting into the energy equation:

2v02=2v1f2+(2v0-2v1fcos(θ))2+(-2v1fsin(θ))2

Expanding the squares and simplifying you arrive to the quadratic equation

6v1f2-8v0v1fcos(θ)+2v02=0

whis has real solution for v1f if cosθ≥√3/2.
 
What would be the case, if the ball is collided with the plate. Just like the table tennis.
Can we also consider the collision between the table tennis racket and ball as the 2D collision like collision between two ball ? ?
Will the shape of the plate will effect the equations ?
 
I am working on the 2D elastic collision problem.
In the attachment find my calculations.
First I solve the problem in forward direction and then I tried to solve the same problem with different angles.
The main problem is, I require another condition to calculate my last parameter.
Can anyone help me ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
699
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top